[PATCH v5.1 1/2] ARM64: dts: meson-gx: use stable UART bindings with correct gate clock
Andreas Färber
afaerber at suse.de
Sun Dec 3 06:15:34 PST 2017
Hi,
Am 21.06.2017 um 16:42 schrieb Neil Armstrong:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb.dtsi
> index 17d3efd..ea53cc2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb.dtsi
> @@ -682,6 +682,31 @@
> clocks = <&clkc CLKID_SPI>;
> };
>
> +&uart_A {
> + clocks = <&xtal>, <&clkc CLKID_UART0>, <&xtal>;
> + clock-names = "xtal", "pclk", "baud";
> +};
> +
> +&uart_AO {
> + clocks = <&xtal>, <&clkc CLKID_CLK81>, <&xtal>;
> + clock-names = "xtal", "pclk", "baud";
> +};
> +
> +&uart_AO_B {
> + clocks = <&xtal>, <&clkc CLKID_CLK81>, <&xtal>;
> + clock-names = "xtal", "pclk", "baud";
> +};
> +
> +&uart_B {
> + clocks = <&xtal>, <&clkc CLKID_UART1>, <&xtal>;
> + clock-names = "xtal", "core", "baud";
Looking at the meson_uart driver, it only looks for a "pclk" clock,
never for "core", and the only unnamed clock used should be the first.
There is no bindings documentation for "core", so I assume this was an
oversight and should be "pclk" everywhere?
> +};
> +
> +&uart_C {
> + clocks = <&xtal>, <&clkc CLKID_UART2>, <&xtal>;
> + clock-names = "xtal", "core", "baud";
> +};
The issue I'm facing is that uart_C on NanoPi K2 is not working in
4.14.1. To my surprise it appears to be probing okay though.
Sadly just overwriting the clock-names property via overlay does not fix
my issue. Any ideas?
> +
> &vpu {
> compatible = "amlogic,meson-gxbb-vpu", "amlogic,meson-gx-vpu";
> };
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl.dtsi
> index 8d4f316..9e67444 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl.dtsi
> @@ -623,6 +623,31 @@
> clocks = <&clkc CLKID_SPI>;
> };
>
> +&uart_A {
> + clocks = <&xtal>, <&clkc CLKID_UART0>, <&xtal>;
> + clock-names = "xtal", "core", "baud";
Same issue spotted here and below.
> +};
> +
> +&uart_AO {
> + clocks = <&xtal>, <&clkc CLKID_CLK81>, <&xtal>;
> + clock-names = "xtal", "pclk", "baud";
> +};
> +
> +&uart_AO_B {
> + clocks = <&xtal>, <&clkc CLKID_CLK81>, <&xtal>;
> + clock-names = "xtal", "pclk", "baud";
> +};
> +
> +&uart_B {
> + clocks = <&xtal>, <&clkc CLKID_UART1>, <&xtal>;
> + clock-names = "xtal", "core", "baud";
> +};
> +
> +&uart_C {
> + clocks = <&xtal>, <&clkc CLKID_UART2>, <&xtal>;
> + clock-names = "xtal", "core", "baud";
> +};
> +
> &vpu {
> compatible = "amlogic,meson-gxl-vpu", "amlogic,meson-gx-vpu";
> };
Regards,
Andreas
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list