[PATCH 2/4] gpiolib: add bitmask for valid GPIO lines
Archit Taneja
architt at codeaurora.org
Fri Dec 1 03:38:17 PST 2017
Hi,
On 11/08/2017 04:37 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Add support for specifying that some GPIOs within a range are unavailable.
> Some systems have a sparse list of GPIOs, where a range of GPIOs is
> specified (usually 0 to n-1), but some subset within that range is
> absent or unavailable for whatever reason.
>
> To support this, allow drivers to specify a bitmask of GPIOs that
> are present or absent. Gpiolib will then block access to those that
> are absent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur at codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> include/linux/gpio/driver.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> index 60553af4c004..c32387936cdd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -1481,22 +1481,36 @@ static struct gpio_chip *find_chip_by_name(const char *name)
>
> static int gpiochip_irqchip_init_valid_mask(struct gpio_chip *gpiochip)
> {
> - if (!gpiochip->irq_need_valid_mask)
> - return 0;
> + if (gpiochip->irq_need_valid_mask) {
> + gpiochip->irq_valid_mask =
> + kcalloc(BITS_TO_LONGS(gpiochip->ngpio),
> + sizeof(long), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!gpiochip->irq_valid_mask)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> - gpiochip->irq_valid_mask = kcalloc(BITS_TO_LONGS(gpiochip->ngpio),
> - sizeof(long), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!gpiochip->irq_valid_mask)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + /* Assume by default all GPIOs are valid */
> + bitmap_fill(gpiochip->irq_valid_mask, gpiochip->ngpio);
> + }
>
> - /* Assume by default all GPIOs are valid */
> - bitmap_fill(gpiochip->irq_valid_mask, gpiochip->ngpio);
> + if (gpiochip->line_need_valid_mask) {
> + gpiochip->line_valid_mask =
> + kcalloc(BITS_TO_LONGS(gpiochip->ngpio),
> + sizeof(long), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!gpiochip->line_valid_mask)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + /* Assume by default all GPIOs are valid */
> + bitmap_fill(gpiochip->line_valid_mask, gpiochip->ngpio);
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> static void gpiochip_irqchip_free_valid_mask(struct gpio_chip *gpiochip)
> {
> + kfree(gpiochip->line_valid_mask);
> + gpiochip->line_valid_mask = NULL;
> +
> kfree(gpiochip->irq_valid_mask);
> gpiochip->irq_valid_mask = NULL;
> }
> @@ -1510,6 +1524,15 @@ static bool gpiochip_irqchip_irq_valid(const struct gpio_chip *gpiochip,
> return test_bit(offset, gpiochip->irq_valid_mask);
> }
>
> +static bool gpiochip_irqchip_line_valid(const struct gpio_chip *gpiochip,
> + unsigned int offset)
> +{
> + /* No mask means all valid */
> + if (likely(!gpiochip->line_valid_mask))
> + return true;
> + return test_bit(offset, gpiochip->line_valid_mask);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * gpiochip_set_cascaded_irqchip() - connects a cascaded irqchip to a gpiochip
> * @gpiochip: the gpiochip to set the irqchip chain to
> @@ -3320,6 +3343,10 @@ struct gpio_desc *__must_check gpiod_get_index(struct device *dev,
> return desc;
> }
>
> + /* Make sure the GPIO is valid before we request it. */
> + if (!gpiochip_irqchip_line_valid(desc->gdev->chip, idx))
> + return ERR_PTR(-EACCES);
We're hitting an issue here ^ when a consumer calls the devm_gpiod_get() API. This API
internally sets idx in gpiod_get_index to always 0. For example, in the call sequence
below, the idx argument to gpiochip_irqchip_line_valid is always 0:
devm_gpiod_get(dev, con_id, flags)
devm_gpiod_get_index(dev, con_id, 0, flags)
gpiod_get_index(dev, con_id, 0, flags)
if (!gpiochip_irqchip_line_valid(desc->gdev->chip, 0))
return ERR_PTR(-EACCES);
Therefore, with these patches, if we create a sparse gpio map, and the
0th gpio is set to "not accessible", all gpio requests end up failing with EACCESS
because idx is always passed as 0.
In gpiochip_irqchip_line_valid, shouldn't we test the nth bit (that corresponds to
this gpio_desc) in chip->line_valid_mask instead of idx passed above, which is always
0?
Thanks,
Archit
> +
> status = gpiod_request(desc, con_id);
> if (status < 0)
> return ERR_PTR(status);
> diff --git a/include/linux/gpio/driver.h b/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
> index 424e5139ff10..853828ccabc8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
> +++ b/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
> @@ -173,6 +173,8 @@ struct gpio_chip {
> bool irq_nested;
> bool irq_need_valid_mask;
> unsigned long *irq_valid_mask;
> + bool line_need_valid_mask;
> + unsigned long *line_valid_mask;
> struct lock_class_key *lock_key;
> #endif
>
>
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list