Possible regression between 4.9 and 4.13

[Mathias Nyman]

On 31.08.2017 12:39, Mason wrote:
> On 30/08/2017 11:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:55:37AM +0200, Mason wrote:
>>
>>> On 30/08/2017 08:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>
>>>> To get back to the original issue here, the hardware seems to have died,
>>>> the driver stops talking to it, and all is good.  The "regression" here
>>>> is that we now properly can determine that the hardware is crap.
>>>
>>> Before 4.12, when I unplugged my USB3 Flash drive, Linux would
>>> detect a few "Uncorrected Non-Fatal errors" via AER, but it was
>>> still possible to plug the drive back in.
>>>
>>> Since 4.12, once I unplug the drive, the whole USB3 card is marked
>>> as dead (all 4 ports), and I can no longer plug anything in (not even
>>> the USB2 drive that didn't have any issues, IIRC).
>>>
>>> It seems a bit premature to "mark as dead" something that remains
>>> functional, doesn't it?
>>
>> I agree, but if the device sends all ones, it's a good indication it is
>> really dead, right?  Or something is wrong with it.
>
> I wouldn't call it dead if I can plug the drive back in, and have
> it working... But I agree that something fishy is happening...
>
>>> Disclaimer, there are many variables in this setup, and I've only
>>> tested a small fraction of the problem space: only one system,
>>> only one USB3 board, only one USB3 Flash drive.
>>
>> Did you ever happen to narrow this down to a single git commit using
>> 'git bisect'?  I can't remember what happened in the beginning of this
>> thread...
>
> Mathias pointed out d9f11ba9f107aa335091ab8d7ba5eea714e46e8b
>

That patch only changes how xhci reacts to reading 0xffffffff.
we used to just returned -ENODEV, but after patch we assume
hardware is broken or removed.

-Mathias