[PATCH 07/10] cpufreq: dt: Add support for some new Allwinner SoCs
Chen-Yu Tsai
wens at csie.org
Mon Aug 14 22:42:19 PDT 2017
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw at rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> On Monday, July 24, 2017 02:23:49 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 23-07-17, 18:27, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> > Some new Allwinner SoCs get supported in the kernel after the
>> > compatibles are added to cpufreq-dt-platdev driver.
>> >
>> > Add their compatible strings in the cpufreq-dt-platdev driver.
>> >
>> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw at rjwysocki.net>
>> > Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>
>> > Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy at aosc.io>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 6 ++++++
>> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
>> > index 2eb40d46d357..c3851453e84a 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
>> > @@ -24,7 +24,11 @@ static const struct of_device_id machines[] __initconst = {
>> > { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a23", },
>> > { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a33", },
>> > { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a83t", },
>> > + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h2-plus", },
>> > { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3", },
>> > + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-v3s", },
>> > + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64", },
>> > + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5", },
>> >
>> > { .compatible = "apm,xgene-shadowcat", },
>> >
>> > @@ -43,6 +47,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id machines[] __initconst = {
>> > { .compatible = "marvell,pxa250", },
>> > { .compatible = "marvell,pxa270", },
>> >
>> > + { .compatible = "nextthing,gr8", },
>> > +
>> > { .compatible = "samsung,exynos3250", },
>> > { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210", },
>> > { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4212", },
>>
>> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>
>>
>>
>
> OK
>
> I'm assuming this will go in via arm-soc along with the rest of the series.
The rest of the series, except for the clk patches I've already taken,
doesn't seem to be going anywhere just yet. Is there a cpufreq or pm tree
this can be merged through?
Thanks
ChenYu
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list