[PATCH 1/4] pinctrl: stm32: set pin to gpio input when used as interrupt
Alexandre Torgue
alexandre.torgue at st.com
Mon Apr 24 12:40:20 EDT 2017
Hi Linus,
On 04/24/2017 02:36 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Alexandre TORGUE
> <alexandre.torgue at st.com> wrote:
>
>> This patch ensures that pin is correctly set as gpio input when it is used
>> as an interrupt.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue at st.com>
> (...)
>
>> +static int stm32_gpio_irq_request_resources(struct irq_data *irq_data)
>> +{
>> + struct stm32_gpio_bank *bank = irq_data->domain->host_data;
>> + u32 ret;
>> +
>> + if (!gpiochip_is_requested(&bank->gpio_chip, irq_data->hwirq)) {
>> + ret = stm32_gpio_request(&bank->gpio_chip, irq_data->hwirq);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>
> This is wrong. You should only use gpiochip_lock_as_irq(), because of the
> following in Documentation/gpio/driver.txt:
>
> ---------------
> It is legal for any IRQ consumer to request an IRQ from any irqchip no matter
> if that is a combined GPIO+IRQ driver. The basic premise is that gpio_chip and
> irq_chip are orthogonal, and offering their services independent of each
> other.
> (...)
> So always prepare the hardware and make it ready for action in respective
> callbacks from the GPIO and irqchip APIs. Do not rely on gpiod_to_irq() having
> been called first.
Ok, so actually the action to set pin in input mode is necessary in
stm32_gpio_irq_request_resources.
I'll fix it in V2.
>
> This orthogonality leads to ambiguities that we need to solve: if there is
> competition inside the subsystem which side is using the resource (a certain
> GPIO line and register for example) it needs to deny certain operations and
> keep track of usage inside of the gpiolib subsystem. This is why the API
> below exists.
>
> Locking IRQ usage
> -----------------
> Input GPIOs can be used as IRQ signals. When this happens, a driver is requested
> to mark the GPIO as being used as an IRQ:
>
> int gpiochip_lock_as_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
>
> This will prevent the use of non-irq related GPIO APIs until the GPIO IRQ lock
> is released:
>
> void gpiochip_unlock_as_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
>
> When implementing an irqchip inside a GPIO driver, these two functions should
> typically be called in the .startup() and .shutdown() callbacks from the
> irqchip.
>
> When using the gpiolib irqchip helpers, these callback are automatically
> assigned.
> --------------
>
> It is because of easy to make errors like this that I prefer that people try
> to use GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP helpers insteaf of rolling their own irqchip code.
I understand. It was difficult in our case due to design.
Thanks for review.
Alex
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list