usb: dwc2: NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 146s
Eric Anholt
eric at anholt.net
Thu Apr 20 14:54:58 EDT 2017
Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren at i2se.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
>> Doug Anderson <dianders at chromium.org> hat am 18. April 2017 um 22:41 geschrieben:
>>
>>
>> It's hard to know for sure that all of this time is really in
>> urb_enqueue(). Possible we could have task switched out and been
>> blocked elsewhere. Using ftrace to get more fine-grained timings
>> would be useful. ktime_get(), ktime_sub(), and ktime_to_us() are your
>> friends here if you want to use trace_printk.
>
> i'm a newbie to ftrace, so i hope this would be helpful.
>
> # connect PL2303 to the onboard hub
> # echo 0 > options/sleep-time
> # echo 0 > function_profile_enabled
> # echo 1 > function_profile_enabled
> # ./usb_test
> # Waiting for at least 20 seconds and then disconnect PL2303
> # echo 0 > function_profile_enabled
> # cat trace_stat/function0
>
> Function Hit Time Avg s^2
> -------- --- ---- --- ---
> bcm2835_handle_irq 361347 219567633 us 607.636 us 1485199 us
> __handle_domain_irq 1082482 212639551 us 196.437 us 3642030 us
> generic_handle_irq 1082482 100592051 us 92.927 us 50511334 us
> irq_exit 1082482 98197771 us 90.715 us 29649040 us
> handle_level_irq 1082482 95812379 us 88.511 us 51910093 us
If I'm reading this output right, we're spending half of our interrupt
processing time in irq_exit(), so even if dwc2's interrupt was free (the
generic_handle_irq() chain), we'd be eating about half the CPU getting
back out of the interrupt handler, right?
I don't really know anything about DWC2 or USB, but is there any way we
could mitigate the interrupt frequency with this hardware? If nothing
else, could we loop reading gintsts until it reads back 0?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20170420/bbabadb5/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list