[RFC PATCH 1/3] clk: add clk_bulk_get accessories
Geert Uytterhoeven
geert at linux-m68k.org
Thu Apr 13 15:57:46 EDT 2017
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 7:19 PM, Leonard Crestez
<leonard.crestez at nxp.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 12:03 +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
>> +/**
>> + * clk_bulk_enable - ungate a bulk of clocks
>> + * @num_clks: the number of clk_bulk_data
>> + * @clks: the clk_bulk_data table being ungated
>> + *
>> + * clk_bulk_enable must not sleep
>> + * Returns 0 on success, -EERROR otherwise.
>> + */
>> +int clk_bulk_enable(int num_clks, struct clk_bulk_data *clks)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_clks; i++) {
>> + ret = clk_enable(clks[i].clk);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + pr_err("Failed to enable clk '%s': %d\n",
>> + clks[i].id, ret);
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +err:
>> + while (--i >= 0)
>> + clk_put(clks[i].clk);
>
> Shouldn't this be clk_disable?
>
> And you can probably use clk_bulk_disable(i, clks) instead
To avoid nasty surprises, clk_bulk_disable() should loop over all clocks
in reverse order.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list