[PATCH RFC 3/5] spi: imx: add selection for iMX53 and iMX6 controller
jiada_wang at mentor.com
jiada_wang at mentor.com
Thu Apr 13 08:14:02 EDT 2017
From: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang at mentor.com>
ECSPI contorller for iMX53 and iMX6 has few hardware issues
comparing to iMX51.
The change add possibility to detect which controller is used
to apply possible workaround and limitations.
Signed-off-by: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang at mentor.com>
---
drivers/spi/spi-imx.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
index 9a7c62f..b2323b9 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
@@ -67,7 +67,8 @@ enum spi_imx_devtype {
IMX27_CSPI,
IMX31_CSPI,
IMX35_CSPI, /* CSPI on all i.mx except above */
- IMX51_ECSPI, /* ECSPI on i.mx51 and later */
+ IMX51_ECSPI, /* ECSPI on i.mx51 */
+ IMX53_ECSPI, /* ECSPI on i.mx53 and later */
};
struct spi_imx_data;
@@ -127,9 +128,32 @@ static inline int is_imx51_ecspi(struct spi_imx_data *d)
return d->devtype_data->devtype == IMX51_ECSPI;
}
+static inline int is_imx53_ecspi(struct spi_imx_data *d)
+{
+ return d->devtype_data->devtype == IMX53_ECSPI;
+}
+
static inline unsigned spi_imx_get_fifosize(struct spi_imx_data *d)
{
- return is_imx51_ecspi(d) ? 64 : 8;
+ switch (d->devtype_data->devtype) {
+ case IMX51_ECSPI:
+ case IMX53_ECSPI:
+ return 64;
+ default:
+ return 8;
+ }
+}
+
+static inline bool spi_imx_has_dmamode(struct spi_imx_data *d)
+{
+ switch (d->devtype_data->devtype) {
+ case IMX35_CSPI:
+ case IMX51_ECSPI:
+ case IMX53_ECSPI:
+ return true;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
}
#define MXC_SPI_BUF_RX(type) \
@@ -746,6 +770,15 @@ static struct spi_imx_devtype_data imx51_ecspi_devtype_data = {
.devtype = IMX51_ECSPI,
};
+static struct spi_imx_devtype_data imx53_ecspi_devtype_data = {
+ .intctrl = mx51_ecspi_intctrl,
+ .config = mx51_ecspi_config,
+ .trigger = mx51_ecspi_trigger,
+ .rx_available = mx51_ecspi_rx_available,
+ .reset = mx51_ecspi_reset,
+ .devtype = IMX53_ECSPI,
+};
+
static const struct platform_device_id spi_imx_devtype[] = {
{
.name = "imx1-cspi",
@@ -766,6 +799,9 @@ static const struct platform_device_id spi_imx_devtype[] = {
.name = "imx51-ecspi",
.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t) &imx51_ecspi_devtype_data,
}, {
+ .name = "imx53-ecspi",
+ .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t) &imx53_ecspi_devtype_data,
+ }, {
/* sentinel */
}
};
@@ -777,6 +813,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id spi_imx_dt_ids[] = {
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx31-cspi", .data = &imx31_cspi_devtype_data, },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx35-cspi", .data = &imx35_cspi_devtype_data, },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx51-ecspi", .data = &imx51_ecspi_devtype_data, },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,imx53-ecspi", .data = &imx53_ecspi_devtype_data, },
{ /* sentinel */ }
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, spi_imx_dt_ids);
@@ -1266,7 +1303,7 @@ static int spi_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
* Only validated on i.mx35 and i.mx6 now, can remove the constraint
* if validated on other chips.
*/
- if (is_imx35_cspi(spi_imx) || is_imx51_ecspi(spi_imx)) {
+ if (spi_imx_has_dmamode(spi_imx)) {
ret = spi_imx_sdma_init(&pdev->dev, spi_imx, master);
if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
goto out_clk_put;
--
2.7.4
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list