[RFC PATCH 4/7] ACPICA: IORT: Add SMMuV3 model definitions.

[Lorenzo Pieralisi]

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:27:55PM +0530, Sunil Kovvuri wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy at arm.com> wrote:
> > On 11/04/17 15:42, linucherian at gmail.com wrote:
> >> From: Linu Cherian <linu.cherian at cavium.com>
> >>
> >> Add SMMuV3 model definitions.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Linu Cherian <linu.cherian at cavium.com>
> >> ---
> >>  include/acpi/actbl2.h | 5 +++++
> >>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/acpi/actbl2.h b/include/acpi/actbl2.h
> >> index 2b4af07..9db67d6 100644
> >> --- a/include/acpi/actbl2.h
> >> +++ b/include/acpi/actbl2.h
> >> @@ -778,6 +778,11 @@ struct acpi_iort_smmu {
> >>  #define ACPI_IORT_SMMU_CORELINK_MMU400  0x00000002   /* ARM Corelink MMU-400 */
> >>  #define ACPI_IORT_SMMU_CORELINK_MMU500  0x00000003   /* ARM Corelink MMU-500 */
> >>
> >> +#define ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3               0x00000000      /* Generic SMMUv3 */
> >> +#define ACPI_IORT_SMMU_CORELINK_MMU600  0x00000001      /* ARM Corelink MMU-600 */
> >> +#define ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3_HISILICON     0x00000002      /* HiSilicon SMMUv3 */
> >> +#define ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3_CAVIUM_CN99XX 0x00000003      /* Cavium CN99xx SMMUv3 */
> >
> > None of those models are listed in the current IORT spec.
> 
> As mentioned in the cover letter, we are in the process of getting
> model no added for our silicon in the soon to be published updated
> IORT spec.

Good, so first get the IORT firmware bindings updated and then post
patches to manage them, there is really no point in commenting on
patches based on FW that can't be written.

Thanks,
Lorenzo