[RFC PATCH 5/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: For ACPI based device probing, set relevant options for different SMMUv3 implementations.

[Linu Cherian]

>> +     switch (model) {
>> +     case ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3:
>> +     case ACPI_IORT_SMMU_CORELINK_MMU600:
>> +             break;
>> +     case ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3_HISILICON:
>> +             smmu->options |= ARM_SMMU_OPT_SKIP_PREFETCH;
>> +             break;
>> +     case ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3_CAVIUM_CN99XX:
>> +             smmu->options |= (ARM_SMMU_OPT_PAGE0_REGS_ONLY |
>> +                               ARM_SMMU_OPT_USE_SHARED_IRQS);
>> +             break;
>> +     default:
>> +             ret = -ENODEV;
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int arm_smmu_device_acpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>                                     struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>>  {
>>       struct acpi_iort_smmu_v3 *iort_smmu;
>>       struct device *dev = smmu->dev;
>>       struct acpi_iort_node *node;
>> +     int ret;
>>
>>       node = *(struct acpi_iort_node **)dev_get_platdata(dev);
>>
>>       /* Retrieve SMMUv3 specific data */
>>       iort_smmu = (struct acpi_iort_smmu_v3 *)node->node_data;
>>
>> +     ret = acpi_smmu_get_options(iort_smmu->model, smmu);
>> +     if (ret < 0)
>> +             return ret;
>> +
>
> could we add at least:
>
>         dev_notice(smmu->dev, "option mask 0x%x\n", smmu->options);
>
> We need a note to see which options have been enabled.
>

Yeah. Will add that.

Thanks.