[v3, 0/7] Add SD UHS-I and eMMC HS200 support for eSDHC

[Y.B. Lu]

Hi Andrian and Uffe,

Do you have any comments on MMC patches?
Could you help to merge the mmc patches if there is no changes requested?

Regarding to the dts patches, I have some more platforms to support.
So I'd like to drop them currently, and send them all to arm mailing list for reviewing.

Thanks a lot.

Best regards,
Yangbo Lu

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Y.B. Lu
> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2017 4:02 PM
> To: Y.B. Lu; linux-mmc at vger.kernel.org; devicetree at vger.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; ulf.hansson at linaro.org; Adrian
> Hunter; Rob Herring; Mark Rutland; Catalin Marinas; Will Deacon
> Cc: Xiaobo Xie
> Subject: RE: [v3, 0/7] Add SD UHS-I and eMMC HS200 support for eSDHC
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Any comments? Thanks.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Yangbo Lu
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yangbo Lu [mailto:yangbo.lu at nxp.com]
> > Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 3:50 PM
> > To: linux-mmc at vger.kernel.org; devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> > kernel at lists.infradead.org; ulf.hansson at linaro.org; Adrian Hunter; Rob
> > Herring; Mark Rutland; Catalin Marinas; Will Deacon
> > Cc: Xiaobo Xie; Y.B. Lu
> > Subject: [v3, 0/7] Add SD UHS-I and eMMC HS200 support for eSDHC
> >
> > It's complicated to support SD UHS-I and eMMC HS200 for eSDHC because
> > there're many differences between eSDHC and SD/eMMC spec. Several
> > differences as below must be considered:
> > 1. Peripheral clock must be used instead of platform clock.
> >     - eSDHC could select peripheral clock or platform clock as its
> clock
> >       source. According to RM, UHS-I/HS200 must use peripheral clock
> > since
> >       it supports higher frequency than platform clock.
> >     - Patch 1 and patch 6 is to support this.
> > 2. Signal voltage switching requires a control circuit out of eSDHC.
> >     - eSDHC supports signal voltage switch from 3.3v to 1.8v by
> >       eSDHC_PROCTL[VOLT_SEL] bit. This bit changes the value of output
> >       signal SDHC_VS, and there must be a control circuit out of eSDHC
> >       to change the signal voltage according to SDHC_VS output signal.
> >     - Patch 2 is to support this.
> > 3. eSDHC uses tuning block for tuning procedure.
> >     - Tuning clock control register must be configured before tuning.
> >     - Patch 3 is to support this.
> > 4. Delay is needed between tuning cycles for HS200 tuning.
> >     - Once a patch removed mdelay between tuning cycles.
> >       But eSDHC needs it.
> >     - Patch 4 and patch 5 is to support this.
> > 5. UHS-I/HS200 modes could be enabled in dts node.
> >     - Patch 7 is to support this.
> >
> > Please review and merge these patches on mmc git tree if no changes
> > are required.
> >
> > Adrian Hunter (1):
> >   mmc: sdhci: Control the delay between tuning commands
> >
> > Yangbo Lu (6):
> >   mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: add peripheral clock support
> >   mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: add support for signal voltage switch
> >   mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: add tuning support
> >   mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: add delay between tuning cycles
> >   arm64: dts: ls1046a: add clocks property and compatible for eSDHC
> node
> >   arm64: dts: ls1046ardb: add MMC HS200/UHS-1 modes support
> >
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1046a-rdb.dts |   8 ++
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1046a.dtsi    |   3 +-
> >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc.h                    |   7 +
> >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c                 | 165
> > +++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c                          |  11 +-
> >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h                          |   2 +
> >  6 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.1.0.27.g96db324