[PATCH v9 02/12] ARM: EXYNOS: remove usage of soc_is_exynosMMMM from pm.c

[pankaj.dubey]

On Friday 07 April 2017 01:54 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey at samsung.com> wrote:
>> soc_is_exynosMMMM is staged for removal after adopting to exynos-chipid
>> driver, so let's remove/minimize usage of any such helper function usage
>> from pm.c.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey at samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c                   | 22 ++++++++++++----------
>>  include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h |  3 +++
>>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
>> index 1a7e5b5..4a73b02 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
>> @@ -123,11 +123,13 @@ int exynos_pm_central_resume(void)
>>  }
>>
>>  /* Ext-GIC nIRQ/nFIQ is the only wakeup source in AFTR */
>> -static void exynos_set_wakeupmask(long mask)
>> +static void exynos_set_wakeupmask(void)
>>  {
>> -       pmu_raw_writel(mask, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK);
>> -       if (soc_is_exynos3250())
>> +       if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos3250")) {
>> +               pmu_raw_writel(EXYNOS3_WAKEUP_MASK_VAL, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK);
>>                 pmu_raw_writel(0x0, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK2);
>> +       } else
>> +               pmu_raw_writel(EXYNOS_WAKEUP_MASK_VAL, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK);
> 
> You need {} around this too. Checkpatch should complain about it as
> well so be sure to run it.
> 

I ran checkpatch before posting, but it didn't complain about this. Here
is the result when I ran it again today on the same patch.

./scripts/checkpatch.pl
exynos-chipid-v9/0002-ARM-EXYNOS-remove-usage-of-soc_is_exynosMMMM-from-pm.patch

total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 81 lines checked

exynos-chipid-v9/0002-ARM-EXYNOS-remove-usage-of-soc_is_exynosMMMM-from-pm.patch
has no obvious style problems and is ready for submission.


Thanks,
Pankaj Dubey
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org>
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> 
>