[PATCHv2 07/16] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: rename irq request/free functions
Mark Rutland
mark.rutland at arm.com
Thu Apr 6 14:29:14 EDT 2017
For historical reasons, portions of the arm_pmu code use a cpu_pmu_
prefix rather than an armpmu_ prefix. While a minor annoyance, this
hasn't been a problem thusfar.
However, to enable ACPI support, we'll need to expose a few things in
header files, and we should aim to keep those consistently namespaced.
In preparation for exporting our IRQ request/free functions, rename
these to have an armpmu_ prefix. For consistency, the 'cpu_pmu'
parameter is also renamed to 'armpmu'.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
Tested-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton at arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
---
drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
index 2442038..3c4e97d 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
@@ -527,12 +527,12 @@ int perf_num_counters(void)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_num_counters);
-static void cpu_pmu_free_irqs(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
+static void armpmu_free_irqs(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
{
int cpu;
- struct pmu_hw_events __percpu *hw_events = cpu_pmu->hw_events;
+ struct pmu_hw_events __percpu *hw_events = armpmu->hw_events;
- for_each_cpu(cpu, &cpu_pmu->supported_cpus) {
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->supported_cpus) {
int irq = per_cpu(hw_events->irq, cpu);
if (!irq)
continue;
@@ -542,20 +542,20 @@ static void cpu_pmu_free_irqs(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
break;
}
- if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &cpu_pmu->active_irqs))
+ if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->active_irqs))
continue;
free_irq(irq, per_cpu_ptr(&hw_events->percpu_pmu, cpu));
}
}
-static int cpu_pmu_request_irqs(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
+static int armpmu_request_irqs(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
{
int cpu, err;
- struct pmu_hw_events __percpu *hw_events = cpu_pmu->hw_events;
+ struct pmu_hw_events __percpu *hw_events = armpmu->hw_events;
const irq_handler_t handler = armpmu_dispatch_irq;
- for_each_cpu(cpu, &cpu_pmu->supported_cpus) {
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->supported_cpus) {
int irq = per_cpu(hw_events->irq, cpu);
if (!irq)
continue;
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ static int cpu_pmu_request_irqs(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
return err;
}
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_pmu->active_irqs);
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->active_irqs);
}
return 0;
@@ -742,7 +742,7 @@ static int cpu_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
{
int err;
- err = cpu_pmu_request_irqs(cpu_pmu);
+ err = armpmu_request_irqs(cpu_pmu);
if (err)
goto out;
@@ -761,7 +761,7 @@ static int cpu_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_PERF_ARM_STARTING,
&cpu_pmu->node);
out:
- cpu_pmu_free_irqs(cpu_pmu);
+ armpmu_free_irqs(cpu_pmu);
return err;
}
--
1.9.1
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list