[RFC PATCH 0/2] extends PWM framework to support PWM dead-times
Claudiu Beznea
claudiu.beznea at microchip.com
Wed Apr 5 07:02:28 PDT 2017
Hi all,
Please give feedback on these patches which extends PWM framework
in order to support PWM dead-times.
For a PWM controller with more than one output signals per PWM channel
dead-times are the delays introduced between the edges of the output
signals and the original signal introduced in dead-time generator
engine.
E.g. consider a PWM controller with with the following diagram:
-----------------
| |---> PWMH
PWM signal --->| Dead-time engine|
| |---> PWML
-----------------
With no dead-time configured, the PWMH and PWML signals will be
complementary signals (rising and falling edges of PWMH and PWML
have opposite leves, same duration and same starting time) as
follows:
____0 D____P ____ ____ ____
PWM signal __| |____| |____| |____| |____| |___
____ ____ ____ ____ ____
PWMH __| |____| |____| |____| |____| |___
__ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___
PWML |____| |____| |____| |____| |____|
Where - 0 is the starting point of the signal
- D is the starting point of the duty-cycle
- P is the signal period
Based on the above diagram:
- rising edge dead-time - is the delay introduced in one of the
dead-time engine output signal; the delay is introduced after
rising edge of PWM signal
- falling edge dead-time - is the delay introduced in one of the
dead-time engine output signal; the delay is introduced after
the end of falling edge of the PWM signal
The following diagram explain how PWM dead-times falls on some signals:
____0 D____P ____ ____ ____
PWM signal __| |____| |____| |____| |____| |___
__ __ __ __ __
PWMH ____| |____re| |______| |______| |______| |___
__ __ __ __ __ __
PWML |______| |____fe| |______| |______| |______|
In the upper diagram:
- re = rising edge = the delay between D point of PWM signal
(rising edge) and the starting point of the next edge
- fe = falling edge = the delay between P point of PWM signal
(falling edge) and the starting point of the next edge
To configure the PWM dead-times new inputs were added to sysfs,
in PWM subsystem, one for rising edge dead-time, one for falling
edge deadtime.
root at sama5d2-xplained:/sys/devices/platform/ahb/ahb:apb/f802c000.pwm/pwm/pwmchip0/pwm2# ls -l
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Feb 10 10:00 capture
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Feb 10 10:01 deadtime_fe
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Feb 10 10:02 deadtime_re
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Feb 10 10:00 duty_cycle
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Feb 10 10:00 enable
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Feb 10 10:00 period
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Feb 10 10:00 polarity
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Feb 10 10:00 power
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Feb 10 10:00 uevent
The PWM dead-times are used in half bridge converters applications.
Please consider that this series was build on top of following
patch series:
[PATCH v3 0/2] switch to atomic PWM
[PATCH v3 1/2] drivers: pwm: pwm-atmel: switch to atomic PWM
[PATCH v3 2/2] drivers: pwm: pwm-atmel: enable PWM on sama5d2
This patch series is not dependent on the other patch series
I've made for extending PWM framework with PWM mode:
[RFC PATCH 0/2] extend PWM framework to support PWM modes
[RFC PATCH 1/2] drivers: pwm: core: implement pwm mode
[RFC PATCH 2/2] drivers: pwm: pwm-atmel: add support for pwm modes
but, if you consider relevant, and both patch changes are considered
relevant for PWM subsistem, I can combine both of them, if any.
Thanks you,
Claudiu Beznea
Claudiu Beznea (2):
drivers: pwm: core: implement pwm dead-times
drivers: pwm: pwm-atmel: implement pwm dead-time
Documentation/pwm.txt | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/pwm/core.c | 10 ++++++-
drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
drivers/pwm/sysfs.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/pwm.h | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 223 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list