[PATCH v3] arm64: print a fault message when attempting to write RO memory
Laura Abbott
labbott at redhat.com
Tue Apr 4 09:05:17 PDT 2017
On 04/03/2017 11:58 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> If a page is marked read only we should print out that fact,
> instead of printing out that there was a page fault. Right now we
> get a cryptic error message that something went wrong with an
> unhandled fault, but we don't evaluate the esr to figure out that
> it was a read/write permission fault.
>
> Instead of seeing:
>
> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff000008e460d8
> pgd = ffff800003504000
> [ffff000008e460d8] *pgd=0000000083473003, *pud=0000000083503003, *pmd=0000000000000000
> Internal error: Oops: 9600004f [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>
> we'll see:
>
> Unable to handle kernel write to read-only memory at virtual address ffff000008e760d8
> pgd = ffff80003d3de000
> [ffff000008e760d8] *pgd=0000000083472003, *pud=0000000083435003, *pmd=0000000000000000
> Internal error: Oops: 9600004f [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>
> We also fold the userspace address check into is_permission_fault()
> instead of at the current callsite so that the function can't be
> abused with software PAN and a kernel space address.
>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse at arm.com>
> Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott at redhat.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd at linaro.org>
Acked-by: Laura Abbott <labbott at redhat.com>
> ---
>
> Changes from v2:
> * Fold addr check into is_permission_fault() (James Morse)
>
> Changes from v1:
> * Move into __do_kernel_fault() (Mark Rutland)
>
> arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> index 156169c6981b..c6560cb4ef50 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> @@ -160,12 +160,32 @@ static bool is_el1_instruction_abort(unsigned int esr)
> return ESR_ELx_EC(esr) == ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_CUR;
> }
>
> +static inline bool is_permission_fault(unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs,
> + unsigned long addr)
> +{
> + unsigned int ec = ESR_ELx_EC(esr);
> + unsigned int fsc_type = esr & ESR_ELx_FSC_TYPE;
> +
> + if (ec != ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_CUR && ec != ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_CUR)
> + return false;
> +
> + if (fsc_type == ESR_ELx_FSC_PERM)
> + return true;
> +
> + if (addr < USER_DS && system_uses_ttbr0_pan())
> + return fsc_type == ESR_ELx_FSC_FAULT &&
> + (regs->pstate & PSR_PAN_BIT);
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * The kernel tried to access some page that wasn't present.
> */
> static void __do_kernel_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> + const char *msg;
> /*
> * Are we prepared to handle this kernel fault?
> * We are almost certainly not prepared to handle instruction faults.
> @@ -177,9 +197,20 @@ static void __do_kernel_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> * No handler, we'll have to terminate things with extreme prejudice.
> */
> bust_spinlocks(1);
> - pr_alert("Unable to handle kernel %s at virtual address %08lx\n",
> - (addr < PAGE_SIZE) ? "NULL pointer dereference" :
> - "paging request", addr);
> +
> + if (is_permission_fault(esr, regs, addr)) {
> + if (esr & ESR_ELx_WNR)
> + msg = "write to read-only memory";
> + else
> + msg = "read from unreadable memory";
> + } else if (addr < PAGE_SIZE) {
> + msg = "NULL pointer dereference";
> + } else {
> + msg = "paging request";
> + }
> +
> + pr_alert("Unable to handle kernel %s at virtual address %08lx\n", msg,
> + addr);
>
> show_pte(mm, addr);
> die("Oops", regs, esr);
> @@ -269,21 +300,6 @@ static int __do_page_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> return fault;
> }
>
> -static inline bool is_permission_fault(unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
> -{
> - unsigned int ec = ESR_ELx_EC(esr);
> - unsigned int fsc_type = esr & ESR_ELx_FSC_TYPE;
> -
> - if (ec != ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_CUR && ec != ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_CUR)
> - return false;
> -
> - if (system_uses_ttbr0_pan())
> - return fsc_type == ESR_ELx_FSC_FAULT &&
> - (regs->pstate & PSR_PAN_BIT);
> - else
> - return fsc_type == ESR_ELx_FSC_PERM;
> -}
> -
> static bool is_el0_instruction_abort(unsigned int esr)
> {
> return ESR_ELx_EC(esr) == ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_LOW;
> @@ -321,7 +337,7 @@ static int __kprobes do_page_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
> mm_flags |= FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
> }
>
> - if (addr < USER_DS && is_permission_fault(esr, regs)) {
> + if (is_permission_fault(esr, regs, addr)) {
> /* regs->orig_addr_limit may be 0 if we entered from EL0 */
> if (regs->orig_addr_limit == KERNEL_DS)
> die("Accessing user space memory with fs=KERNEL_DS", regs, esr);
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list