[PATCH 1/2] [media] cec: Move capability check inside #if
Lee Jones
lee.jones at linaro.org
Tue Apr 4 05:54:09 PDT 2017
On Tue, 04 Apr 2017, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 04/04/2017 02:32 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > If CONFIG_RC_CORE is not enabled then none of the RC code will be
> > executed anyway, so we're placing the capability check inside the
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/cec/cec-core.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/cec/cec-core.c b/drivers/media/cec/cec-core.c
> > index 37217e2..06a312c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/cec/cec-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/cec/cec-core.c
> > @@ -234,10 +234,10 @@ struct cec_adapter *cec_allocate_adapter(const struct cec_adap_ops *ops,
> > return ERR_PTR(res);
> > }
> >
> > +#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_RC_CORE)
> > if (!(caps & CEC_CAP_RC))
> > return adap;
> >
> > -#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_RC_CORE)
> > /* Prepare the RC input device */
> > adap->rc = rc_allocate_device(RC_DRIVER_SCANCODE);
> > if (!adap->rc) {
> >
>
> Not true, there is an #else further down.
I saw the #else. It's inert code that becomes function-less.
> That said, this code is clearly a bit confusing.
>
> It would be better if at the beginning of the function we'd have this:
>
> #if !IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_RC_CORE)
> caps &= ~CEC_CAP_RC;
> #endif
>
> and then drop the #else bit and (as you do in this patch) move the #if up.
>
> Can you make a new patch for this?
Sure.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list