[PATCH] arm64: Correctly bounds check virt_addr_valid
Mark Rutland
mark.rutland at arm.com
Wed Sep 21 10:58:55 PDT 2016
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:28:48AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> virt_addr_valid is supposed to return true if and only if virt_to_page
> returns a valid page structure. The current macro does math on whatever
> address is given and passes that to pfn_valid to verify. vmalloc and
> module addresses can happen to generate a pfn that 'happens' to be
> valid. Fix this by only performing the pfn_valid check on addresses that
> have the potential to be valid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott at redhat.com>
> ---
> This caused a bug at least twice in hardened usercopy so it is an
> actual problem.
Are there other potentially-broken users of virt_addr_valid? It's not
clear to me what some drivers are doing with this, and therefore whether
we need to cc stable.
> A further TODO is full DEBUG_VIRTUAL support to
> catch these types of mistakes.
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> index 31b7322..f741e19 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static inline void *phys_to_virt(phys_addr_t x)
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
> #define virt_to_page(kaddr) pfn_to_page(__pa(kaddr) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
> -#define virt_addr_valid(kaddr) pfn_valid(__pa(kaddr) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
> +#define virt_addr_valid(kaddr) (((u64)kaddr) >= PAGE_OFFSET && pfn_valid(__pa(kaddr) >> PAGE_SHIFT))
> #else
> #define __virt_to_pgoff(kaddr) (((u64)(kaddr) & ~PAGE_OFFSET) / PAGE_SIZE * sizeof(struct page))
> #define __page_to_voff(kaddr) (((u64)(page) & ~VMEMMAP_START) * PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct page))
> @@ -222,8 +222,8 @@ static inline void *phys_to_virt(phys_addr_t x)
> #define page_to_virt(page) ((void *)((__page_to_voff(page)) | PAGE_OFFSET))
> #define virt_to_page(vaddr) ((struct page *)((__virt_to_pgoff(vaddr)) | VMEMMAP_START))
>
> -#define virt_addr_valid(kaddr) pfn_valid((((u64)(kaddr) & ~PAGE_OFFSET) \
> - + PHYS_OFFSET) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
> +#define virt_addr_valid(kaddr) (((u64)kaddr) >= PAGE_OFFSET && pfn_valid((((u64)(kaddr) & ~PAGE_OFFSET) \
> + + PHYS_OFFSET) >> PAGE_SHIFT))
> #endif
> #endif
Given the common sub-expression, perhaps it would be better to leave
these as-is, but prefix them with '_', and after the #endif, have
something like:
#define _virt_addr_is_linear(kaddr) (((u64)(kaddr)) >= PAGE_OFFSET)
#define virt_addr_valid(kaddr) (_virt_addr_is_linear(kaddr) && _virt_addr_valid(kaddr))
Otherwise, modulo the parenthesis issue you mentioned, this looks
logically correct to me.
Thanks,
Mark.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list