[RFC PATCH v2 11/11] irqchip: mbigen: promote mbigen init
Hanjun Guo
hanjun.guo at linaro.org
Mon Sep 19 02:49:29 PDT 2016
On 2016/9/15 23:24, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 14/09/16 15:21, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo at linaro.org>
>>
>> mbigen is an irqchip and it needs to be probed before
>> devices, same logic is used for SMMU and etc., let's
>> use arch_initcall instead of platform init for mbigen.
>>
>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de>
>> Cc: Ma Jun <majun258 at huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo at linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/irqchip/irq-mbigen.c | 6 +++++-
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mbigen.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mbigen.c
>> index ca6add1..3a33de6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mbigen.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mbigen.c
>> @@ -374,7 +374,11 @@ static struct platform_driver mbigen_platform_driver = {
>> .probe = mbigen_device_probe,
>> };
>>
>> -module_platform_driver(mbigen_platform_driver);
>> +static __init int mbigen_init(void)
>> +{
>> + return platform_driver_register(&mbigen_platform_driver);
>> +}
>> +arch_initcall(mbigen_init);
>>
>> MODULE_AUTHOR("Jun Ma <majun258 at huawei.com>");
>> MODULE_AUTHOR("Yun Wu <wuyun.wu at huawei.com>");
>>
>
> I've already NACKed such a patch in the past, and I will carry on
> NACKing it until all the other avenues (like properly tracking device
> dependencies) have been explored and have been proven not to be fit for
> purpose.
I'd happy to work on this to make progress.
>
> Rafael had proposed something around this subject last year, and I've
Sorry, obviously I missed something, could you give me the link about
Rafael's patches? I will pull back and test it on our hardware.
> been repeatedly advising you to work with him and others to make it
> happen. You can choose to ignore this advise, but that doesn't make this
> patch an acceptable approach.
OK, I will drop this patch in next version, and work on the generic
solution instead.
Thanks
Hanjun
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list