[PATCH V5] perf tools: adding support for address filters
Adrian Hunter
adrian.hunter at intel.com
Wed Sep 14 06:41:33 PDT 2016
On 13/09/16 17:18, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On 13 September 2016 at 04:01, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter at intel.com> wrote:
>> On 12/09/16 20:53, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>>> This patch makes it possible to use the current filter
>>> framework with address filters. That way address filters for
>>> HW tracers such as CoreSight and IntelPT can be communicated
>>> to the kernel drivers.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier at linaro.org>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Changes for V5:
>>> - Modified perf_evsel__append_filter() to take a string format
>>> rather than an operation.
>>
>> Hope I'm not being a pain, but aren't there other places calling
>> perf_evsel__append_filter() that need to be changed. Might make
>> sense as a separate patch.
>
> No no, you're right - I completely overlooked that.
>
> But shouldn't it be in the same patch? That way a git bisect would
> stay consistent...
I meant changing perf_evsel__append_filter() and callers in a separate
preparatory patch. Perhaps add and use:
int perf_evsel__append_tp_filter(struct perf_evsel *evsel, const char *filter)
{
return perf_evsel__append_filter(evsel, "(%s) && (%s)", filter);
}
>
>>
>>>
>>> Changes for V4:
>>> - Added support for address filters over more than one
>>> nibble.
>>> - Removed Jiri's ack, this version is too different from
>>> what was reviewed.
>>>
>>> Changes for V3:
>>> - Added Jiri's ack.
>>> - Rebased to v4.8-rc5.
>>>
>>> Changes for V2:
>>> - Rebased to v4.8-rc4.
>>> - Revisited error path.
>>>
>>>
>>> tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 4 ++--
>>> tools/perf/util/evsel.h | 2 +-
>>> tools/perf/util/parse-events.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>> 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
>>> index d40f852d2de2..a9bb277f221f 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
>>> @@ -1047,14 +1047,14 @@ int perf_evsel__set_filter(struct perf_evsel *evsel, const char *filter)
>>> }
>>>
>>> int perf_evsel__append_filter(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
>>> - const char *op, const char *filter)
>>> + const char *fmt, const char *filter)
>>> {
>>> char *new_filter;
>>>
>>> if (evsel->filter == NULL)
>>> return perf_evsel__set_filter(evsel, filter);
>>>
>>> - if (asprintf(&new_filter,"(%s) %s (%s)", evsel->filter, op, filter) > 0) {
>>> + if (asprintf(&new_filter, fmt, evsel->filter, filter) > 0) {
>>> free(evsel->filter);
>>> evsel->filter = new_filter;
>>> return 0;
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
>>> index 8ceb7ebb51f5..50595c8c7207 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
>>> @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ void perf_evsel__set_sample_id(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
>>>
>>> int perf_evsel__set_filter(struct perf_evsel *evsel, const char *filter);
>>> int perf_evsel__append_filter(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
>>> - const char *op, const char *filter);
>>> + const char *fmt, const char *filter);
>>> int perf_evsel__apply_filter(struct perf_evsel *evsel, int ncpus, int nthreads,
>>> const char *filter);
>>> int perf_evsel__apply_drv_configs(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
>>> index 2eb8b1ed4cc8..8e683979ccd8 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
>>> @@ -1760,20 +1760,50 @@ foreach_evsel_in_last_glob(struct perf_evlist *evlist,
>>> static int set_filter(struct perf_evsel *evsel, const void *arg)
>>> {
>>> const char *str = arg;
>>> + bool found = false;
>>> + int nr_addr_filters = 0;
>>> + struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
>>>
>>> - if (evsel == NULL || evsel->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT) {
>>> - fprintf(stderr,
>>> - "--filter option should follow a -e tracepoint option\n");
>>> - return -1;
>>> + if (evsel == NULL)
>>> + goto err;
>>> +
>>> + if (evsel->attr.type == PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT) {
>>> + if (perf_evsel__append_filter(evsel,
>>> + "(%s) && (%s)", str) < 0) {
>>> + fprintf(stderr,
>>> + "not enough memory to hold filter string\n");
>>> + return -1;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - if (perf_evsel__append_filter(evsel, "&&", str) < 0) {
>>> + while ((pmu = perf_pmu__scan(pmu)) != NULL)
>>> + if (pmu->type == evsel->attr.type) {
>>> + found = true;
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (found)
>>> + perf_pmu__scan_file(pmu, "nr_addr_filters",
>>> + "%d", &nr_addr_filters);
>>> +
>>> + if (!nr_addr_filters)
>>> + goto err;
>>> +
>>> + if (perf_evsel__append_filter(evsel, "%s,%s", str) < 0) {
>>> fprintf(stderr,
>>> "not enough memory to hold filter string\n");
>>> return -1;
>>> }
>>>
>>> return 0;
>>> +
>>> +err:
>>> + fprintf(stderr,
>>> + "--filter option should follow a -e tracepoint or HW tracer option\n");
>>> +
>>> + return -1;
>>> }
>>>
>>> int parse_filter(const struct option *opt, const char *str,
>>>
>>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list