[PATCH 1/1] ARM: dma: fix dma_max_pfn()

Roger Quadros rogerq at ti.com
Mon Sep 12 04:38:24 PDT 2016


Hi Santosh & Russell,

On 19/08/16 19:38, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> 
> On 8/19/2016 12:30 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Hi Santosh,
>>
> 
>>>> So I'm 99.9% convinced that the proposed change is correct.
>>>>
>>> I will got with that then :-) and take my objection back. Just
>>> saying that if there other breakages which I can't recollect now,
>>> those drivers needs to be patched as well.
>>>
>> I was able to boot the Keystone2 Edison EVM over NFS with the $subject patch.
>> Boot log is below. Do you see anything suspicious?
>>
> Logs looks ok to me. Probably do some tests where DMA and bounce buffers etc gets tested. Running it through your internal regression
> suit will be good idea as well if thats possible.
> 

This has been running in our internal test suite for a week on various TI
platforms. There haven't been any surprises.

Is it a good idea to at least put this in -next for a wider test audience?

cheers,
-roger



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list