[PATCH] clk: stm32f4: don't assume 48MHz clock is derived from primary PLL

Alexandre Torgue alexandre.torgue at st.com
Fri Sep 9 02:57:15 PDT 2016


Hi Andrea,

On 09/08/2016 09:01 AM, Andrea Merello wrote:
> This driver just look at the PLLs configurations set by the
> bootloader, but it assumes the 48MHz clock is derived from the primary
> PLL; however using PLLSAI is another option for generating the 48MHz
> clock.
>
> This patch make the driver to check for this, and eventually adjust the
> clock tree accordingly

Another patch-set is ongoing concerning RTC clock for stm32f4. It is 
developed by Gabriel Fernandez (I add him directly in this reply).
Can you check with him how he plans to manage this RTC clock in order to 
have something similar / coherent for SAI clocks, 48MHz ....

Concerning this patch,
When I look at the clock tree I see that 48 MHz is only provided by pll 
named "PLL". So If you use PLL SAI to provide a clock at 48 MHz, you 
actually use SAI_A or SAI_B clock. I'm right ?

I think we need to have something more configurable. Each special clock 
(SAI / RTC /LCd ...) have to be configurable and each "parents" (PLL / 
PLLI2S / PLLSAI) should be described at least in the driver.

Gabriel,

Can you send a draft of your patch-set for RTC clock to Andrea, in order 
to discuss about this topic.

Thanks

Alex


>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Merello <andrea.merello at gmail.com>
> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette at baylibre.com>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd at codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32 at gmail.com>
> Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue at st.com>
> Cc: Bruno Herrera <bruherrera at gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
> index 02d6810..7f1ba8f 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <linux/of_address.h>
>
> +#define STM32F4_RCC_CR			0x00
>  #define STM32F4_RCC_PLLCFGR		0x04
>  #define STM32F4_RCC_CFGR		0x08
>  #define STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR		0x30
> @@ -31,6 +32,8 @@
>  #define STM32F4_RCC_AHB3ENR		0x38
>  #define STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR		0x40
>  #define STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR		0x44
> +#define STM32F4_RCC_PLLSAICFGR		0x88
> +#define STM32F4_RCC_DCKCFGR		0x8C
>
>  struct stm32f4_gate_data {
>  	u8	offset;
> @@ -238,16 +241,35 @@ static struct clk *clk_register_apb_mul(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>  static void stm32f4_rcc_register_pll(const char *hse_clk, const char *hsi_clk)
>  {
>  	unsigned long pllcfgr = readl(base + STM32F4_RCC_PLLCFGR);
> -
> +	unsigned long pllsaicfgr = readl(base + STM32F4_RCC_PLLSAICFGR);
> +	unsigned long dckcfgr = readl(base + STM32F4_RCC_DCKCFGR);
> +	unsigned long rcccr = readl(base + STM32F4_RCC_CR);
> +	bool saien = rcccr & BIT(28);
>  	unsigned long pllm   = pllcfgr & 0x3f;
>  	unsigned long plln   = (pllcfgr >> 6) & 0x1ff;
>  	unsigned long pllp   = BIT(((pllcfgr >> 16) & 3) + 1);
>  	const char   *pllsrc = pllcfgr & BIT(22) ? hse_clk : hsi_clk;
>  	unsigned long pllq   = (pllcfgr >> 24) & 0xf;
> +	bool src48_sai = dckcfgr & BIT(27);
> +	unsigned long pllsain = (pllsaicfgr >> 6) & 0x1ff;
> +	unsigned long pllsaip = BIT(((pllsaicfgr >> 16) & 3) + 1);
>
>  	clk_register_fixed_factor(NULL, "vco", pllsrc, 0, plln, pllm);
>  	clk_register_fixed_factor(NULL, "pll", "vco", 0, 1, pllp);
> -	clk_register_fixed_factor(NULL, "pll48", "vco", 0, 1, pllq);
> +
> +	if (src48_sai && !saien) {
> +		pr_err("48MHz derived from SAI PLL, but SAI PLL disabled (blame the bootloader)\n");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (saien)
> +		clk_register_fixed_factor(NULL, "sai",
> +					pllsrc, 0, pllsain, pllm);
> +
> +	if (src48_sai)
> +		clk_register_fixed_factor(NULL, "pll48", "sai", 0, 1, pllsaip);
> +	else
> +		clk_register_fixed_factor(NULL, "pll48", "vco", 0, 1, pllq);
>  }
>
>  /*
>




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list