[PATCH v2 0/3] gpio/pinctrl: imx: let IOMUX controller know about on-SoC GPIOs
Shawn Guo
shawnguo at kernel.org
Wed Sep 7 19:28:01 PDT 2016
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 04:48:13AM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> The change establishes a connection between on-SoC IOMUX controller(s)
> and GPIO controllers found on some SoC from Freescale/NXP iMX series,
> if a GPIO controller device node contains common gpio-ranges information.
>
> The change is backward compatible with respect to potentially not updated
> outdated DTB data without gpio-ranges propery, for such boards the only
> functional change is lowered initcall priority of GPIO controller driver,
> which in general anyway is exected to be used only after pinctrl/pinmux
> controller.
>
> If this change is applied the next interesting applications may be done
> as a follow-up work, for example switching pad function to GPIO on gpiod
> request, converting iomux controller driver to strict type and so on.
>
> For actual values of gpio-ranges properties please reference series
> "ARM: dts: imx: add gpio-ranges properties to some iMX GPIO controllers"
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg525258.html
>
> Changes from v1 to v2:
> * replaced 2/3 by an own change providing a better commit description
> and which moves gpio_mxc_init() call to subsys_initcall() instead of
> apparently too late device_initcall(), this mitigates Shawn's
> expressed concern about the change.
Yes, this is more conservative and stands less chance to cause regression.
>
> Vladimir Zapolskiy (3):
> pinctrl: imx: accept gpio request/free from pinctrl
> gpio: mxc: shift gpio_mxc_init() to subsys_initcall level
> gpio: mxc: add generic gpio request/free callbacks to pinctrl
For the series,
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo at kernel.org>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list