[PATCH v2 2/3] gpio: mxc: shift gpio_mxc_init() to subsys_initcall level
Vladimir Zapolskiy
vladimir_zapolskiy at mentor.com
Wed Sep 7 18:48:15 PDT 2016
In general situation on-SoC GPIO controller drivers should be probed
after pinctrl/pinmux controller driver, because on-SoC GPIOs utilize a
pin/pad as a resource provided and controlled by pinctrl subsystem.
This is stated in multiple places, e.g. from drivers/Makefile:
GPIO must come after pinctrl as gpios may need to mux pins etc
Looking at Freescale iMX SoC series specifics, imx*_pinctrl_init()
functions are called at arch_initcall and postcore_initcall init
levels, so the change of initcall level for gpio-mxc driver from
postcore_initcall to subsys_initcall level is sufficient. Also note
that the most of GPIO controller drivers settled at subsys_initcall
level.
If pinctrl subsystem manages pads with GPIO functions, the change is
needed to avoid unwanted driver probe deferrals during kernel boot.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy at mentor.com>
---
Changes from v1 to v2:
* replaced by a change with better commit description and which
moves gpio_mxc_init() call to subsys_initcall() instead of
apparently too late device_initcall(), this mitigates Shawn's
expressed concern about the change.
drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
index 1b342a3842c8..1fdd5d804b5b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
@@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static int __init gpio_mxc_init(void)
{
return platform_driver_register(&mxc_gpio_driver);
}
-postcore_initcall(gpio_mxc_init);
+subsys_initcall(gpio_mxc_init);
MODULE_AUTHOR("Freescale Semiconductor, "
"Daniel Mack <danielncaiaq.de>, "
--
2.8.1
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list