[PATCH v2] arm64: Improve kprobes test for atomic sequence
Masami Hiramatsu
mhiramat at kernel.org
Tue Sep 6 22:52:44 PDT 2016
On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 13:54:59 -0400
David Long <dave.long at linaro.org> wrote:
> From: "David A. Long" <dave.long at linaro.org>
>
> Kprobes searches backwards a finite number of instructions to determine if
> there is an attempt to probe a load/store exclusive sequence. It stops when
> it hits the maximum number of instructions or a load or store exclusive.
> However this means it can run up past the beginning of the function and
> start looking at literal constants. This has been shown to cause a false
> positive and blocks insertion of the probe. To fix this, further limit the
> backwards search to stop if it hits a symbol address from kallsyms. The
> presumption is that this is the entry point to this code (particularly for
> the common case of placing probes at the beginning of functions).
>
> This also improves efficiency by not searching code that is not part of the
> function. There may be some possibility that the label might not denote the
> entry path to the probed instruction but the likelihood seems low and this
> is just another example of how the kprobes user really needs to be
> careful about what they are doing.
Hi Dave,
kallsyms_lookup_size_offset() part looks good to me. By the way,
is there any reason we'll check the _text and module's base address
boundary?
I think those are already searced by kallsyms_lookup_size_offset(),
so you don't need to check those. If the address is not found by
kallsyms_lookup_size_offset(), that address maybe out-of-text.
Thank you,
>
> Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long at linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/probes/decode-insn.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/decode-insn.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/decode-insn.c
> index 37e47a9..356ee52 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/decode-insn.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/decode-insn.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/kprobes.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/kallsyms.h>
> #include <asm/kprobes.h>
> #include <asm/insn.h>
> #include <asm/sections.h>
> @@ -122,7 +123,7 @@ arm_probe_decode_insn(kprobe_opcode_t insn, struct arch_specific_insn *asi)
> static bool __kprobes
> is_probed_address_atomic(kprobe_opcode_t *scan_start, kprobe_opcode_t *scan_end)
> {
> - while (scan_start > scan_end) {
> + while (scan_start >= scan_end) {
> /*
> * atomic region starts from exclusive load and ends with
> * exclusive store.
> @@ -144,26 +145,43 @@ arm_kprobe_decode_insn(kprobe_opcode_t *addr, struct arch_specific_insn *asi)
> kprobe_opcode_t insn = le32_to_cpu(*addr);
> kprobe_opcode_t *scan_start = addr - 1;
> kprobe_opcode_t *scan_end = addr - MAX_ATOMIC_CONTEXT_SIZE;
> + unsigned long size = 0, offset = 0;
> #if defined(CONFIG_MODULES) && defined(MODULES_VADDR)
> struct module *mod;
> #endif
>
> - if (addr >= (kprobe_opcode_t *)_text &&
> - scan_end < (kprobe_opcode_t *)_text)
> - scan_end = (kprobe_opcode_t *)_text;
> + /*
> + * If there's a symbol defined in front of and near enough to
> + * the probe address assume it is the entry point to this
> + * code and use it to further limit how far back we search
> + * when determining if we're in an atomic sequence.
> + */
> + if (kallsyms_lookup_size_offset((unsigned long) addr, &size, &offset))
> + if (offset < (MAX_ATOMIC_CONTEXT_SIZE*sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t)))
> + scan_end = addr - (offset / sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t));
> +
> + if (scan_end <= scan_start) {
> + if (addr >= (kprobe_opcode_t *)_text &&
> + scan_end < (kprobe_opcode_t *)_text)
> + scan_end = (kprobe_opcode_t *)_text;
> #if defined(CONFIG_MODULES) && defined(MODULES_VADDR)
> - else {
> - preempt_disable();
> - mod = __module_address((unsigned long)addr);
> - if (mod && within_module_init((unsigned long)addr, mod) &&
> - !within_module_init((unsigned long)scan_end, mod))
> - scan_end = (kprobe_opcode_t *)mod->init_layout.base;
> - else if (mod && within_module_core((unsigned long)addr, mod) &&
> - !within_module_core((unsigned long)scan_end, mod))
> - scan_end = (kprobe_opcode_t *)mod->core_layout.base;
> - preempt_enable();
> - }
> + else {
> + preempt_disable();
> + mod = __module_address((unsigned long)addr);
> + if (mod &&
> + within_module_init((unsigned long)addr, mod) &&
> + !within_module_init((unsigned long)scan_end, mod))
> + scan_end =
> + (kprobe_opcode_t *)mod->init_layout.base;
> + else if (mod &&
> + within_module_core((unsigned long)addr, mod) &&
> + !within_module_core((unsigned long)scan_end, mod))
> + scan_end =
> + (kprobe_opcode_t *)mod->core_layout.base;
> + preempt_enable();
> + }
> #endif
> + }
> decoded = arm_probe_decode_insn(insn, asi);
>
> if (decoded == INSN_REJECTED ||
> --
> 2.5.0
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat at kernel.org>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list