[PATCH V10 7/8] irqchip/gicv3-its: Factor out PCI-MSI part that might be reused for ACPI
Tomasz Nowicki
tn at semihalf.com
Tue Sep 6 03:22:57 PDT 2016
Hi Thomas,
On 06.09.2016 11:50, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Sep 2016, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>> -static int __init its_pci_msi_init(void)
>> +static int __init its_pci_msi_init_one(struct fwnode_handle *handle,
>> + const char *name)
>> {
>> - struct device_node *np;
>> struct irq_domain *parent;
>>
>> + parent = irq_find_matching_fwnode(handle, DOMAIN_BUS_NEXUS);
>> + if (!parent || !msi_get_domain_info(parent)) {
>> + pr_err("%s: Unable to locate ITS domain\n", name);
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!pci_msi_create_irq_domain(handle, &its_pci_msi_domain_info,
>> + parent)) {
>> + pr_err("%s: Unable to create PCI domain\n", name);
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> So you have error codes here.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __init its_pci_of_msi_init(void)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *np;
>> +
>> for (np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, its_device_id); np;
>> np = of_find_matching_node(np, its_device_id)) {
>> if (!of_property_read_bool(np, "msi-controller"))
>> continue;
>>
>> - parent = irq_find_matching_host(np, DOMAIN_BUS_NEXUS);
>> - if (!parent || !msi_get_domain_info(parent)) {
>> - pr_err("%s: unable to locate ITS domain\n",
>> - np->full_name);
>> + if (its_pci_msi_init_one(of_node_to_fwnode(np), np->full_name))
>> continue;
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (!pci_msi_create_irq_domain(of_node_to_fwnode(np),
>> - &its_pci_msi_domain_info,
>> - parent)) {
>> - pr_err("%s: unable to create PCI domain\n",
>> - np->full_name);
>> - continue;
>> - }
>>
>> pr_info("PCI/MSI: %s domain created\n", np->full_name);
>> }
>>
>> return 0;
>
> And no matter what you return success
>
>> }
>> +
>> +static int __init its_pci_msi_init(void)
>> +{
>> + its_pci_of_msi_init();
>
> Which you subsequently ignore here. What's the point?
>
Well, this patch is meant to refactor the code. It does not change the
error handing nor the functionality. However, you have got a point but
IMO it should be fixed in separate patch if possible.
Thanks,
Tomasz
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list