[GIT PULL] firmware: add support for TI System Control Interface (TI-SCI) protocol driver

Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilimkar at oracle.com
Fri Sep 2 10:05:53 PDT 2016


On 9/2/2016 10:03 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Tero Kristo <t-kristo at ti.com> wrote:
>> Hi Santosh,
>>
>> The following changes since commit 29b4817d4018df78086157ea3a55c1d9424a7cfc:
>>
>>   Linux 4.8-rc1 (2016-08-07 18:18:00 -0700)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>>   https://github.com/t-kristo/linux-pm.git 4.8-rc1-ti-sci-fw
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to 7a2c510cdfa6a4b2f4200c122a377c4d5f4af552:
>>
>>   firmware: ti_sci: Add support for reboot core service (2016-08-31 14:50:20
>> +0300)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Nishanth Menon (5):
>>       Documentation: Add support for TI System Control Interface (TI-SCI)
>> protocol
>>       firmware: Add basic support for TI System Control Interface (TI-SCI)
>> protocol
>>       firmware: ti_sci: Add support for Device control
>>       firmware: ti_sci: Add support for Clock control
>>       firmware: ti_sci: Add support for reboot core service
>>
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone/ti,sci.txt    |   66 +
>>  MAINTAINERS                                        |   10 +
>>  drivers/firmware/Kconfig                           |   15 +
>>  drivers/firmware/Makefile                          |    1 +
>>  drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c                          | 1997
>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/firmware/ti_sci.h                          |  492 +++++
>>  include/linux/soc/ti/ti_sci_protocol.h             |  249 +++
>>  7 files changed, 2830 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone/ti,sci.txt
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/ti_sci.h
>>  create mode 100644 include/linux/soc/ti/ti_sci_protocol.h
>>
>
> Folks, could you hold back on this pull request.. Rob did have a
> comment on https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9305413/ which I think
> should be discussed as well -> has implications to the driver arch
> ofcourse.
>
Sure !!



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list