[PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: nsp: constify pinctrl_ops and pinmux_ops structures
Julia Lawall
Julia.Lawall at lip6.fr
Thu Sep 1 11:42:20 PDT 2016
Check for pinctrl_ops and pinmux_ops structures that are only stored in the
pctlops field and the pmxops field, respectively, of a pinctrl_desc
structure. These fields are declared const, so pinctrl_ops and pinmux_ops
structures that have this property can be declared as const also.
The semantic patch that makes this change in the pinctrl_ops is as
follows. The pinmux_ops case is similar. (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@r disable optional_qualifier@
identifier i;
position p;
@@
static struct pinctrl_ops i at p = { ... };
@ok@
identifier r.i;
struct pinctrl_desc e;
position p;
@@
e.pctlops = &i at p;
@bad@
position p != {r.p,ok.p};
identifier r.i;
struct pinctrl_ops e;
@@
e at i@p
@depends on !bad disable optional_qualifier@
identifier r.i;
@@
static
+const
struct pinctrl_ops i = { ... };
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall at lip6.fr>
---
drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-mux.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-mux.c b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-mux.c
index 4149db3..35c1765 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-mux.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-mux.c
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ static void nsp_pin_dbg_show(struct pinctrl_dev *pctrl_dev,
seq_printf(s, " %s", dev_name(pctrl_dev->dev));
}
-static struct pinctrl_ops nsp_pinctrl_ops = {
+static const struct pinctrl_ops nsp_pinctrl_ops = {
.get_groups_count = nsp_get_groups_count,
.get_group_name = nsp_get_group_name,
.get_group_pins = nsp_get_group_pins,
@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ static void nsp_gpio_disable_free(struct pinctrl_dev *pctrl_dev,
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pinctrl->lock, flags);
}
-static struct pinmux_ops nsp_pinmux_ops = {
+static const struct pinmux_ops nsp_pinmux_ops = {
.get_functions_count = nsp_get_functions_count,
.get_function_name = nsp_get_function_name,
.get_function_groups = nsp_get_function_groups,
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list