[RFC][PATCH] arm64: Add support for CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL
Mark Rutland
mark.rutland at arm.com
Fri Oct 28 07:49:51 PDT 2016
Hi Laura,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 05:18:12PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> x86 has an option CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL to do additional checks
> on virt_to_phys calls. The goal is to catch users who are calling
> virt_to_phys on non-linear addresses immediately. As features
> such as CONFIG_VMAP_STACK get enabled for arm64, this becomes
> increasingly important. Add checks to catch bad virt_to_phys
> usage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott at redhat.com>
> ---
> This has been on my TODO list for a while. It caught a few bugs with
> CONFIG_VMAP_STACK on x86 so when that eventually gets added
> for arm64 it will be useful to have. This caught one driver calling __pa on an
> ioremapped address already.
This is fantastic; thanks for putting this together!
> RFC for a couple of reasons:
>
> 1) This is basically a direct port of the x86 approach.
> 2) I needed some #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ which I don't like to throw around.
> 3) I'm not quite sure about the bounds check for the VIRTUAL_BUG_ON with KASLR,
> specifically the _end check.
> 4) Is it worth actually keeping this as DEBUG_VIRTUAL vs. folding it into
> another option?
I think it's worth aligning with x86, so modulo a couple of comments
below, (1) and (4) seem fine. I think (2) just requires an additional
shuffle.
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 11 ++++++++++-
> arch/arm64/mm/Makefile | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/mm/physaddr.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> lib/Kconfig.debug | 2 +-
> mm/cma.c | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/mm/physaddr.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> index ba62df8..9805adc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> @@ -106,11 +106,19 @@
> * private definitions which should NOT be used outside memory.h
> * files. Use virt_to_phys/phys_to_virt/__pa/__va instead.
> */
> -#define __virt_to_phys(x) ({ \
> +#define __virt_to_phys_nodebug(x) ({ \
> phys_addr_t __x = (phys_addr_t)(x); \
> __x & BIT(VA_BITS - 1) ? (__x & ~PAGE_OFFSET) + PHYS_OFFSET : \
> (__x - kimage_voffset); })
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +extern unsigned long __virt_to_phys(unsigned long x);
> +#endif
> +#else
> +#define __virt_to_phys(x) __virt_to_phys_nodebug(x)
> +#endif
> +
> #define __phys_to_virt(x) ((unsigned long)((x) - PHYS_OFFSET) | PAGE_OFFSET)
> #define __phys_to_kimg(x) ((unsigned long)((x) + kimage_voffset))
I think we can move all the existing conversion logic here (including
into page_to_phys/phys_to_page) into the existing #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
block at the end of the file. Assembly clearly can't use these, and we
already have virt_to_phys and others in that #ifndef.
Assuming that works, would you mind doing that as a preparatory patch?
> @@ -202,6 +210,7 @@ static inline void *phys_to_virt(phys_addr_t x)
> * Drivers should NOT use these either.
> */
> #define __pa(x) __virt_to_phys((unsigned long)(x))
> +#define __pa_nodebug(x) __virt_to_phys_nodebug((unsigned long)(x))
> #define __va(x) ((void *)__phys_to_virt((phys_addr_t)(x)))
> #define pfn_to_kaddr(pfn) __va((pfn) << PAGE_SHIFT)
> #define virt_to_pfn(x) __phys_to_pfn(__virt_to_phys(x))
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile b/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
> index 54bb209..bcea84e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
> @@ -5,6 +5,6 @@ obj-y := dma-mapping.o extable.o fault.o init.o \
> obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE) += hugetlbpage.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_PTDUMP) += dump.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_NUMA) += numa.o
> -
> +obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL) += physaddr.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_KASAN) += kasan_init.o
> KASAN_SANITIZE_kasan_init.o := n
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/physaddr.c b/arch/arm64/mm/physaddr.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6c271e2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/physaddr.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> +#include <linux/mm.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/memory.h>
> +
> +unsigned long __virt_to_phys(unsigned long x)
> +{
> + phys_addr_t __x = (phys_addr_t)x;
> +
> + if (__x & BIT(VA_BITS - 1)) {
> + /* The bit check ensures this is the right range */
> + return (__x & ~PAGE_OFFSET) + PHYS_OFFSET;
> + } else {
> + VIRTUAL_BUG_ON(x < kimage_vaddr || x > (unsigned long)_end);
IIUC, in (3) you were asking if the last check should be '>' or '>='?
To match high_memory, I suspect the latter, as _end doesn't fall within
the mapped virtual address space.
> + return (__x - kimage_voffset);
> + }
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__virt_to_phys);
It's a bit annoying that we have to duplicate the logic here to add the
VIRTUAL_BUG_ON(), but I see that x86 also do this, and I don't have a
better suggestion.
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> index 33bc56c..e5634bb 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ config DEBUG_VM_PGFLAGS
>
> config DEBUG_VIRTUAL
> bool "Debug VM translations"
> - depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && X86
> + depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && (X86 || ARM64)
I have no strong feelings about this, but perhaps it's nicer to have
something like ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VIRTUAL?
> help
> Enable some costly sanity checks in virtual to page code. This can
> catch mistakes with virt_to_page() and friends.
> diff --git a/mm/cma.c b/mm/cma.c
> index 384c2cb..2345803 100644
> --- a/mm/cma.c
> +++ b/mm/cma.c
> @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ int __init cma_declare_contiguous(phys_addr_t base,
> phys_addr_t highmem_start;
> int ret = 0;
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86
> +#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
Rather than an architecture list, can we depend on DEBUG_VIRTUAL? Are
there other checks that we're trying to avoid?
... or could we avoid ifdeffery entirely with something like:
/*
* We can't use __pa(high_memory) directly, since high_memory
* isn't a valid direct map VA, and DEBUG_VIRTUAL will (validly)
* complain. Find the boundary by adding one to the last valid
* address.
*/
highmem_start = __pa(high_memory - 1) + 1;
Thanks,
Mark.
> /*
> * high_memory isn't direct mapped memory so retrieving its physical
> * address isn't appropriate. But it would be useful to check the
> --
> 2.7.4
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list