[PATCH/RFT v2 12/17] USB: ochi-da8xx: Use a regulator for vbus/overcurrent
Axel Haslam
ahaslam at baylibre.com
Tue Oct 25 03:52:23 PDT 2016
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar at ti.com> wrote:
> On Monday 24 October 2016 10:16 PM, ahaslam at baylibre.com wrote:
>> From: Axel Haslam <ahaslam at baylibre.com>
>>
>> Currently, the da8xx ohci driver uses a set of gpios and callbacks in
>> board files to handle vbus and overcurrent irqs form the power supply.
>> However, this does not play nice when moving to a DT based boot were
>> we wont have board files.
>>
>> Instead of requesting and handling the gpio, use the regulator framework
>> to take care of enabling and disabling vbus power. This has the benefit
>> that we dont need to pass any more platform data to the driver:
>>
>> These will be handled by the regulator framework:
>> set_power -> regulator_enable/regulator_disable
>> get_power -> regulator_is_enabled
>> get_oci -> regulator_get_mode
>> ocic_notify -> regulator notification
>>
>> We can keep the default potpgt and use the regulator start delay instead:
>> potpgt -> regulator startup delay time
>>
>> The hawk board does not have a GPIO/OVERCURRENT gpio to control vbus,
>> (they should not have been decleared/reserved) so, just remove those
>> definitions from the hwk board file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Axel Haslam <ahaslam at baylibre.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da830-evm.c | 97 ++++++++----------------
>> arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-omapl138-hawk.c | 96 +-----------------------
>> arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-davinci/usb-da8xx.c | 3 +-
>> drivers/usb/host/ohci-da8xx.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++----------
>> include/linux/platform_data/usb-davinci.h | 19 -----
>> 6 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 223 deletions(-)
>
> Can you separate out the driver enhancement from the platform
> (mach-davinci) changes? They need to go through different trees.
>
Ok, i will do that, (it might require intermediate code to have
the driver working on each patch)
> Thanks,
> Sekhar
>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list