[PATCH 00/10] arm64: move thread_info off of the task stack

[Mark Rutland]

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:38:59AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 10/19/2016 12:10 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >Building atop of Andy's work on x86 and generic code, these patches move
> >arm64's thread_info off of the stack and into task_struct. This protects
> >thread_info from corruption in the face of stack overflow, and serves as
> >a step towards fully robust stack overflow handling, which will be
> >addressed by subsequent patches.
> >
> >These patches are based atop of a preparatory series [1] (itself based
> >on v4.9-rc1) that's also necessary for s390. I've placed those patches
> >in a branch [2] on my kernel.org repo, along with this series [3]. I'm
> >hoping that the prep work will be able to become a stable branch/tag
> >soon.
> >
> >I've given the series some light testing on a couple of SMP arm64
> >platforms, but this has yet to see a thorough beating; please do try to
> >make this fall over!
> >
> >Since RFC [4]:
> >* Rely on prior patches to make thread_info arch-specific
> >* Make smp_processor_id() use a per-cpu variable
> >* Split out current_stack_pointer
> >* Make SMP actually work
> >
> >[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1476901693-8492-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com
> >[2] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git/log/?h=core/ti-stack-split
> >[3] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git/log/?h=arm64/ti-stack-split
> >[4] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473947349-14521-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com

> I pulled the arm64/ti-stack-split branch on top of a Fedora
> tree and ran back-to-back kernel RPM builds for a long weekend.
> It's still going as of this morning so you can take that as a
> 
> Tested-by: Laura Abbott <labbott at redhat.com>

Thanks! That's much appreciated!

Just to check, did you grab the version with entry.S fixes rolled in
(where the head is 657f54256c427fec)?

Thanks,
Mark.