[RESEND PATCH v6, 4/5] usb: Add MediaTek USB3 DRD Driver
Matthias Brugger
matthias.bgg at gmail.com
Tue Oct 11 03:23:55 PDT 2016
On 10/11/2016 05:14 AM, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 13:00 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>
>> On 09/21/2016 07:54 AM, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
>>> This patch adds support for the MediaTek USB3 controller
>>> integrated into MT8173. It can be configured as Dual-Role
>>> Device (DRD), Peripheral Only and Host Only (xHCI) modes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun at mediatek.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/usb/Kconfig | 2 +
>>> drivers/usb/Makefile | 1 +
>>> drivers/usb/mtu3/Kconfig | 54 +++
>>> drivers/usb/mtu3/Makefile | 19 +
>>> drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3.h | 422 +++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_core.c | 871 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_dr.c | 379 ++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_dr.h | 108 +++++
>>> drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_gadget.c | 731 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_gadget_ep0.c | 883 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_host.c | 294 ++++++++++++
>>> drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_hw_regs.h | 473 +++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_plat.c | 490 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_qmu.c | 599 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_qmu.h | 43 ++
>>> 15 files changed, 5369 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/usb/mtu3/Kconfig
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/usb/mtu3/Makefile
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3.h
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_core.c
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_dr.c
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_dr.h
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_gadget.c
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_gadget_ep0.c
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_host.c
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_hw_regs.h
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_plat.c
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_qmu.c
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_qmu.h
>>>
>>
>> As Oliver already said, this patch is quiet big which makes it difficult
>> to review.
>> I propose to provide a first implementation with minimal functionality
>> and incremental patches on top of this when the first got merged.
>>
>> You could split the patch in three series/parts:
>> 1. Host only
>> 2. Peripheral only
>> 3. Dual mode
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> Ok, I'll split the patch into some small ones as many as possible.
There is no direct policy how to do that and it depends a bit on every
maintainer what he prefers. As a rule of thumb each commit should
compile on it's own without errors. This makes bisecting the kernel much
easier.
Regards,
Matthias
>
> Thanks a lot
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matthias
>>
>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list