[PATCH 1/2] ARM: imx: fix integer overflow in AV PLL round rate

[Fabio Estevam]

Hi Emil,

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Emil Lundmark <emil at limesaudio.com> wrote:
> I realize that the two patches in this series does not actually depend on
> each other. This is my first contribution to Linux so I wonder if I should
> resubmit these as two separate patches instead?
>
> For example, what if the second patch in the series is not needed? Do you
> only accept the first patch then? Or what if I need to revise the second
> patch? It seems unnecessary to include the first patch in that case.
>
> I also got the threading wrong, but thats another story.

It is better to resend these two patches and mark them as v2:
[PATCH v2 1/2]
[PATCH v2 2/2]

Then put below the --- line what has changed from the previous one. If
nothing changed just put "None".

I am wondering if your patch series tries to fix the regression
reported by Ken Lin or is it unrelated?
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-October/460451.html