[PATCH] dt-bindings: document how to setup rockchip timers as clocksource

Rob Herring robh at kernel.org
Wed Nov 30 13:30:06 PST 2016


On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 01:12:16AM +0300, Alexander Kochetkov wrote:
> The patch describes how to setup rockchip timers in device tree
> so they can be used as clocksource.
> 
> I'm going to implement this feature.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kochetkov <al.kochet at gmail.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/timer/rockchip,rk-timer.txt           |   35 +++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/rockchip,rk-timer.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/rockchip,rk-timer.txt
> index 7bc9691..15f8fed 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/rockchip,rk-timer.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/rockchip,rk-timer.txt
> @@ -16,7 +16,18 @@ Required properties:
>  - clock-names : must include the following entries:
>    "timer", "pclk"
>  
> -Example:
> +Note:
> +If device tree contain only one timer, than the timer will be intialized
> +as clockevent provider. If device tree contain two timers, than first timer
> +will be initialized as clockevent provider and second one as clocksource.

1st and 2nd are ambiguous. Plus this is an OS implementation detail that 
doesn't belong in the binding.

> +If you want to bind specific timer as clockevent (i.e. one from alive subsystem)
> +and specific timer as clocksource, you can number the timers in "aliases" node.

No. 

Use and/or describe what are the features of a timer to make the 
decision. There has to be some reason you care which one. One has an 
interrupt and the other doesn't. One is always on. Etc.

Rob



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list