[PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc/reloc64: add support for 32-bit CRC pseudo-symbols
Michael Ellerman
mpe at ellerman.id.au
Fri Nov 25 03:29:01 PST 2016
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel at linaro.org> writes:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/relocs_check.sh b/arch/powerpc/relocs_check.sh
> index ec2d5c835170..2f510fbc87da 100755
> --- a/arch/powerpc/relocs_check.sh
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/relocs_check.sh
> @@ -43,7 +43,8 @@ R_PPC_ADDR16_HA
> R_PPC_RELATIVE
> R_PPC_NONE' |
> grep -E -v '\<R_PPC64_ADDR64[[:space:]]+mach_' |
> - grep -E -v '\<R_PPC64_ADDR64[[:space:]]+__crc_'
> + grep -E -v '\<R_PPC64_ADDR64[[:space:]]+__crc_' |
> + grep -E -v '\<R_PPC64_ADDR32[[:space:]]+\*ABS\*'
I'm still getting:
WARNING: 24 bad relocations
c000000000d307c4 R_PPC64_ADDR32 __crc___arch_hweight16
c000000000d307c8 R_PPC64_ADDR32 __crc___arch_hweight32
c000000000d307cc R_PPC64_ADDR32 __crc___arch_hweight64
c000000000d307d0 R_PPC64_ADDR32 __crc___arch_hweight8
c000000000d30848 R_PPC64_ADDR32 __crc___bswapdi2
c000000000d30854 R_PPC64_ADDR32 __crc___clear_user
c000000000d30868 R_PPC64_ADDR32 __crc___copy_tofrom_user
c000000000d30d4c R_PPC64_ADDR32 __crc__mcount
c000000000d31344 R_PPC64_ADDR32 __crc_copy_page
c000000000d3141c R_PPC64_ADDR32 __crc_current_stack_pointer
c000000000d31840 R_PPC64_ADDR32 __crc_empty_zero_page
c000000000d31a7c R_PPC64_ADDR32 __crc_flush_dcache_range
c000000000d31a84 R_PPC64_ADDR32 __crc_flush_icache_range
c000000000d32608 R_PPC64_ADDR32 __crc_load_fp_state
c000000000d32614 R_PPC64_ADDR32 __crc_load_vr_state
c000000000d32828 R_PPC64_ADDR32 __crc_memchr
c000000000d32830 R_PPC64_ADDR32 __crc_memcmp
c000000000d32834 R_PPC64_ADDR32 __crc_memcpy
c000000000d32840 R_PPC64_ADDR32 __crc_memmove
c000000000d32888 R_PPC64_ADDR32 __crc_memset
c000000000d33c9c R_PPC64_ADDR32 __crc_store_fp_state
c000000000d33ca0 R_PPC64_ADDR32 __crc_store_vr_state
c000000000d33cf0 R_PPC64_ADDR32 __crc_strncmp
c000000000d33cf4 R_PPC64_ADDR32 __crc_strncpy
If I just add those to the whitelist it builds, but then things aren't
happy at boot:
[ 7.607687] kvm: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
[ 7.846799] virtio: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
[ 22.012615] crc32c_vpmsum: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
[ 22.012959] libcrc32c: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
cheers
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list