Synopsys Ethernet QoS Driver

Ozgur Karatas mueddib at yandex.com
Tue Nov 22 00:38:20 PST 2016


Hello all,

I think, ethtool and mdio don't work because the tool's not support to "QoS", right?

Maybe, need a new API. I'm looking for dwceqos code but "tc" tools is very idea.

I hope to be me always helpful.

Regards,

Ozgur

21.11.2016, 16:38, "Giuseppe CAVALLARO" <peppe.cavallaro at st.com>:
> Hello Joao
>
> On 11/21/2016 2:48 PM, Joao Pinto wrote:
>>  Synopsys QoS IP is a separated hardware component, so it should be reusable by
>>  all implementations using it and so have its own "core driver" and platform +
>>  pci glue drivers. This is necessary for example in hardware validation, where
>>  you prototype an IP and instantiate its drivers and test it.
>>
>>  Was there a strong reason to integrate QoS features directly in stmmac and not
>>  in synopsys/dwc_eth_qos.*?
>
> We decided to enhance the stmmac on supporting the QoS for several
> reasons; for example the common APIs that the driver already exposed and
> actually suitable for other SYNP chips. Then, PTP, EEE,
> S/RGMII, MMC could be shared among different chips with a minimal
> effort. This meant a lot of code already ready.
>
> For sure, the net-core, Ethtool, mdio parts were reused. Same for the
> glue logic files.
> For the latter, this helped to easily bring-up new platforms also
> because the stmmac uses the HW cap register to auto-configure many
> parts of the MAC core, DMA and modules. This helped many users, AFAIK.
>
> For validation purpose, this is my experience, the stmmac helped
> a lot because people used the same code to validate different HW
> and it was easy to switch to a platform to another one in order to
> verify / check if the support was ok or if a regression was introduced.
> This is important for complex supports like PTP or EEE.
>
> Hoping this can help.
>
> Do not hesitate to contact me for further details
>
> peppe



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list