[PATCH v16 08/15] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Refactor arch_timer_needs_probing, and call it only if acpi disabled.
Mark Rutland
mark.rutland at arm.com
Fri Nov 18 11:56:57 PST 2016
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 09:49:01PM +0800, fu.wei at linaro.org wrote:
> From: Fu Wei <fu.wei at linaro.org>
>
> The patch refactor original arch_timer_needs_probing function:
> (1) Separate out arch_timer_needs_probing from arch_timer_common_init,
> and call it only if acpi disabled.
> (2) Rename arch_timer_needs_probing to arch_timer_needs_of_probing.
Please write a real commit message.
> Signed-off-by: Fu Wei <fu.wei at linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> index fe4e812..9ddc091 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> @@ -792,15 +792,28 @@ static const struct of_device_id arch_timer_mem_of_match[] __initconst = {
> {},
> };
>
> -static bool __init
> -arch_timer_needs_probing(int type, const struct of_device_id *matches)
> +static bool __init arch_timer_needs_of_probing(void)
> {
> struct device_node *dn;
> bool needs_probing = false;
> + unsigned int mask = ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15 | ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_MEM;
> +
> + /* We have two timers, and both device-tree nodes are probed. */
> + if ((arch_timers_present & mask) == mask)
> + return false;
> +
> + /*
> + * Only one type of timer is probed,
> + * check if we have another type of timer node in device-tree.
> + */
> + if (arch_timers_present & ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15)
> + dn = of_find_matching_node(NULL, arch_timer_mem_of_match);
> + else
> + dn = of_find_matching_node(NULL, arch_timer_of_match);
>
> - dn = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matches);
> - if (dn && of_device_is_available(dn) && !(arch_timers_present & type))
> + if (dn && of_device_is_available(dn))
> needs_probing = true;
> +
> of_node_put(dn);
>
> return needs_probing;
> @@ -808,17 +821,8 @@ arch_timer_needs_probing(int type, const struct of_device_id *matches)
>
> static int __init arch_timer_common_init(void)
> {
> - unsigned int mask = ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15 | ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_MEM;
> -
> - /* Wait until both nodes are probed if we have two timers */
> - if ((arch_timers_present & mask) != mask) {
> - if (arch_timer_needs_probing(ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_MEM,
> - arch_timer_mem_of_match))
> - return 0;
> - if (arch_timer_needs_probing(ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15,
> - arch_timer_of_match))
> - return 0;
> - }
Why can't we just move this into the DT-specific caller of
arch_timer_common_init()?
Thanks
Mark.
> + if (acpi_disabled && arch_timer_needs_of_probing())
> + return 0;
>
> arch_timer_banner(arch_timers_present);
> arch_counter_register(arch_timers_present);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list