[RFC 4/6] ARM: dts: dra7: add entry for bb2d module

[Nishanth Menon]

On 11/18/2016 04:59 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 17.11.2016, 20:44 -0600 schrieb Robert Nelson:
>> From: Gowtham Tammana <g-tammana at ti.com>
>>
>> BB2D entry is added to the dts file. Crossbar index number is used
>> for interrupt mapping.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gowtham Tammana <g-tammana at ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen at ti.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
>> index addb753..43488b6 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
>> @@ -959,6 +959,16 @@
>>  			ti,hwmods = "dmm";
>>  		};
>>
>> +		bb2d: bb2d at 59000000 {
>> +			compatible = "ti,dra7-bb2d";
>> +			reg = <0x59000000 0x0700>;
>> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 120 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> +			ti,hwmods = "bb2d";
>> +			clocks = <&dpll_core_h24x2_ck>;
>> +			clock-names = "fclk";
>
> "fclk" is not an accepted clock name for the etnaviv driver. It supports
> up to 3 clocks: "bus", "core" and "shader". If there is only one clock
> required in your design it would probably be the "core" clock.

fclk is used as a standard for all hwmod (SoC level control library 
that existed prior to ARM DT-fication, and now slowly being converted 
to DT). I think the core and bus clock is the same here.. I wonder if 
something duplicated like the following will fly?

clocks = <&dpll_core_h24x2_ck>, <&dpll_core_h24x2_ck> ;
clock-names = "fclk", "core";

It might have been better if hwmod clocks were'nt assumed from 
clock-names.. instead it could have been something like:
ti,hwmod-fck-clk-names = "core";
ti,hwmod-ick-clk-names = "bus";
ti,hwmod-ock-clk-names = "shader";
clocks = <&dpll_core_h24x2_ck>, <&clk2>, <&clk3>;
clock-names = "core", "bus", "shader";

Tero: ?

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon