[PATCH 1/3] arm: hisi: add ARCH_MULTI_V5 support

Jiancheng Xue xuejiancheng at hisilicon.com
Wed Nov 16 19:03:42 PST 2016


Hi Wei,

On 2016/11/16 17:31, Wei Xu wrote:
> Hi Pan,
> 
> On 2016/11/16 8:56, wenpan wrote:
>> Hi Marty,
>> Does this confict with your patch? If not,I hope this could be merged first.  Besides could you tell me the link to your related patch?
> 
> This is the link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9334743/
> 

Thank you for offering this.If I want to give some comments on Marty's patch,
what should I do?

For Marty's patch, I think there's no need to add specific config item ARCH_HIxxxx
for every chipset. Some existing chipsets depend on ARCH_HISI directly like Hi3519
and Hi3798CV200. If some options like ARM_GIC is removed from ARCH_HISI, this kind
of chipsets will must choose other place to select it. I suggest we should keep selecting
ARM_GIC under ARCH_HISI as Pan's patch do.

The code may be like this:

config ARCH_HISI
 	bool "Hisilicon SoC Support"
-	depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7
+	depends on ARCH_MULTI_V5 || ARCH_MULTI_V6 || ARCH_MULTI_V7
 	select ARM_AMBA
-	select ARM_GIC
+	select ARM_GIC if ARCH_MULTI_V7
+	select ARM_VIC if ARCH_MULTI_V5 || depends on ARCH_MULTI_V6
 	select ARM_TIMER_SP804
 	select POWER_RESET
 	select POWER_RESET_HISI
 	select POWER_SUPPLY

What's your opinion?

Best Regards,
Jiancheng

>> On 2016/10/17 21:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Monday, October 17, 2016 8:07:03 PM CEST Pan Wen wrote:
>>>> Add support for some HiSilicon SoCs which depend on ARCH_MULTI_V5.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Pan Wen <wenpan at hisilicon.com>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Looks ok. I've added Marty Plummer to Cc, he was recently proposing
>>> patches for Hi3520, which I think is closely related to this one.
>>> Please try to work together so the patches don't conflict. It should
>>> be fairly straightforward since you are basically doing the same
>>> change here.
>>>





More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list