[PATCH 1/2] ARM: davinci: PM: rework init, support DT platforms

[Kevin Hilman]

Sekhar Nori <nsekhar at ti.com> writes:

> Hi Kevin,
>
> Looks good to me overall, I have some minor comments.
>
> On Tuesday 15 November 2016 04:34 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Remove fake platform device used for PM init.  Move pdata values which
>> are common across all current platforms into pm.c.
>> 
>> Also add PM support for DT platforms (vi da8xx-dt.c)
>
> Can you please separate out PM enabling on DT platform to a separate
> patch? Its a small change, but it will be nice to separate it from rest
> of the cleanup.

Yes, will do.

>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h
>> index f9f9713aacdd..3d7a13789661 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h
>> @@ -101,7 +101,6 @@ int da8xx_register_gpio(void *pdata);
>>  int da850_register_cpufreq(char *async_clk);
>>  int da8xx_register_cpuidle(void);
>>  void __iomem *da8xx_get_mem_ctlr(void);
>> -int da850_register_pm(struct platform_device *pdev);
>>  int da850_register_sata(unsigned long refclkpn);
>>  int da850_register_vpif(void);
>>  int da850_register_vpif_display
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/pm.c
>> index 8929569b1f8a..fc6a5710b3fa 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/pm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/pm.c
>> @@ -23,13 +23,18 @@
>>  #include <mach/da8xx.h>
>>  #include "sram.h"
>>  #include <mach/pm.h>
>> +#include <mach/mux.h>
>
> Can you please add the mux.h inclusion above pm.h? Looks like the sram.h
> inclusion is out of place already, but since you are touching this part,
> can you please move it below along with rest of the local includes.
>
> I see that linux/ includes are not sorted as well, but lets keep that
> aside until someone needs to touch them.
>
>>  #include "clock.h"
>> +#include "psc.h"
>>  
>> +#define DA850_PLL1_BASE		0x01e1a000
>>  #define DEEPSLEEP_SLEEPCOUNT_MASK	0xFFFF
>> +#define DEEPSLEEP_SLEEPCOUNT		128
>>  
>>  static void (*davinci_sram_suspend) (struct davinci_pm_config *);
>> -static struct davinci_pm_config *pdata;
>> +static struct davinci_pm_config pm_config;
>> +static struct davinci_pm_config *pdata = &pm_config;
>>  
>>  static void davinci_sram_push(void *dest, void *src, unsigned int size)
>>  {
>> @@ -117,17 +122,38 @@ static const struct platform_suspend_ops davinci_pm_ops = {
>>  	.valid		= suspend_valid_only_mem,
>>  };
>>  
>> -static int __init davinci_pm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +int __init davinci_pm_init(void)
>>  {
>> -	pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
>> -	if (!pdata) {
>> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot get platform data\n");
>> -		return -ENOENT;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = davinci_cfg_reg(DA850_RTC_ALARM);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	pdata->sleepcount = DEEPSLEEP_SLEEPCOUNT;
>> +	pdata->ddr2_ctlr_base = da8xx_get_mem_ctlr();
>> +	pdata->deepsleep_reg = DA8XX_SYSCFG1_VIRT(DA8XX_DEEPSLEEP_REG);
>> +	pdata->ddrpsc_num = DA8XX_LPSC1_EMIF3C;
>
> Some of these could be statically initialized in pm_config. Can you
> please move the constants to static initialization.

Yes.

Kevin