[PATCH RFC 3/2] ARM: improve arch_irq_work_has_interrupt()
Russell King - ARM Linux
linux at armlinux.org.uk
Mon Nov 14 10:07:34 PST 2016
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 04:30:57PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h
> index 3d6dc8b..45612d2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,16 @@ extern void smp_init_cpus(void);
> */
> extern void set_smp_cross_call(void (*)(const struct cpumask *, unsigned int));
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +#define setup_smp_ipi(f,i) \
> + do { \
> + set_smp_cross_call(f); \
> + irq_controller_can_ipi = (i); \
> + } while(0)
> +#else
> +#define setup_smp_ipi(f,i) do { } while (0)
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * Called from platform specific assembly code, this is the
> * secondary CPU entry point.
>
> with the similar entry point for arm64?
Note that asm/smp.h is not included if CONFIG_SMP is not set, so it's
not that easy.
Both ARM64 and ARM have asm/smp_plat.h which contains the platform
specifics of SMP, which is where set_smp_cross_call() really should
be anyway, and the GIC code already includes this. So I'm moving
set_smp_cross_call() there for both arches.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list