ACPI namespace details for ARM64
Lorenzo Pieralisi
lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com
Fri Nov 11 03:28:29 PST 2016
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 04:05:06PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
[...]
> ACPI defined a Producer/Consumer bit that was intended to distinguish
> the bridge apertures from the bridge registers [4, 5]. However, BIOSes
> didn't use that bit correctly, and the result is that OSes have to
> assume that everything in a PCI host bridge _CRS is a window. That
> leaves no way to describe the bridge registers in the PNP0A03/PNP0A08
> device itself.
ACPI 6.1 states that in the revision changes 4.0a Apr.2010 (xiii)
"Consumer/Producer bit is ignored (Restored 2.0C change that had
been lost)" and still that bit is marked as valid. If it is not
reliable it should be set as "ignored" in the specs (as it was
on ACPI 2.0C, BTW), as it is it is just a source of confusion.
Thanks again !
Lorenzo
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list