[PATCH 1/6] clk: stm32f4: Add PLL_I2S & PLL_SAI for STM32F429/469 boards
Radosław Pietrzyk
radoslaw.pietrzyk at gmail.com
Mon Nov 7 06:57:05 PST 2016
> +static struct clk_hw *clk_register_pll_div(const char *name,
> + const char *parent_name, unsigned long flags,
> + void __iomem *reg, u8 shift, u8 width,
> + u8 clk_divider_flags, const struct clk_div_table *table,
> + struct clk_hw *pll_hw, spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> + struct stm32f4_pll_div *pll_div;
> + struct clk_hw *hw;
> + struct clk_init_data init;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* allocate the divider */
> + pll_div = kzalloc(sizeof(*pll_div), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pll_div)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + init.name = name;
> + init.ops = &stm32f4_pll_div_ops;
> + init.flags = flags;
Maybe it's worth to have CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT here and the VCO clock
should have CLK_SET_RATE_GATE flag and we can get rid of custom
divider ops.
> -static void stm32f4_rcc_register_pll(const char *hse_clk, const char *hsi_clk)
> +
> +static struct clk_hw *stm32f4_rcc_register_pll(const char *pllsrc,
> + const struct stm32f4_pll_data *data, spinlock_t *lock)
> {
> - unsigned long pllcfgr = readl(base + STM32F4_RCC_PLLCFGR);
> + struct stm32f4_pll *pll;
> + struct clk_init_data init = { NULL };
> + void __iomem *reg;
> + struct clk_hw *pll_hw;
> + int ret;
> +
> + pll = kzalloc(sizeof(*pll), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pll)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + init.name = data->vco_name;
> + init.ops = &stm32f4_pll_gate_ops;
> + init.flags = CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED;
CLK_SET_RATE_GATE here
Moreover why not having VCO as a composite clock from gate and mult ?
According to docs SAI VCO (don't know about I2S ) must be within
certain range so clk_set_rate_range should be somewhere.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list