[PATCH v5 5/7] net: ethernet: bgmac: device tree phy enablement

Rafal Milecki rafal at milecki.pl
Thu Nov 3 01:31:21 PDT 2016


On 11/02/2016 06:08 PM, Jon Mason wrote:
> Change the bgmac driver to allow for phy's defined by the device tree

This is a late review, I know, sorry... :(


> +static int bcma_phy_direct_connect(struct bgmac *bgmac)
> +{
> +	struct fixed_phy_status fphy_status = {
> +		.link = 1,
> +		.speed = SPEED_1000,
> +		.duplex = DUPLEX_FULL,
> +	};
> +	struct phy_device *phy_dev;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	phy_dev = fixed_phy_register(PHY_POLL, &fphy_status, -1, NULL);
> +	if (!phy_dev || IS_ERR(phy_dev)) {
> +		dev_err(bgmac->dev, "Failed to register fixed PHY device\n");
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}
> +
> +	err = phy_connect_direct(bgmac->net_dev, phy_dev, bgmac_adjust_link,
> +				 PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MII);
> +	if (err) {
> +		dev_err(bgmac->dev, "Connecting PHY failed\n");
> +		return err;
> +	}
> +
> +	return err;
> +}

This bcma specific function looks exactly the same as...


> +static int platform_phy_direct_connect(struct bgmac *bgmac)
> +{
> +	struct fixed_phy_status fphy_status = {
> +		.link = 1,
> +		.speed = SPEED_1000,
> +		.duplex = DUPLEX_FULL,
> +	};
> +	struct phy_device *phy_dev;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	phy_dev = fixed_phy_register(PHY_POLL, &fphy_status, -1, NULL);
> +	if (!phy_dev || IS_ERR(phy_dev)) {
> +		dev_err(bgmac->dev, "Failed to register fixed PHY device\n");
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}
> +
> +	err = phy_connect_direct(bgmac->net_dev, phy_dev, bgmac_adjust_link,
> +				 PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MII);
> +	if (err) {
> +		dev_err(bgmac->dev, "Connecting PHY failed\n");
> +		return err;
> +	}
> +
> +	return err;
> +}

This one.

Would that make sense to keep bgmac_phy_connect_direct and just use it in
bcma/platform code?



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list