[PATCH v5 5/7] net: ethernet: bgmac: device tree phy enablement
Rafal Milecki
rafal at milecki.pl
Thu Nov 3 01:31:21 PDT 2016
On 11/02/2016 06:08 PM, Jon Mason wrote:
> Change the bgmac driver to allow for phy's defined by the device tree
This is a late review, I know, sorry... :(
> +static int bcma_phy_direct_connect(struct bgmac *bgmac)
> +{
> + struct fixed_phy_status fphy_status = {
> + .link = 1,
> + .speed = SPEED_1000,
> + .duplex = DUPLEX_FULL,
> + };
> + struct phy_device *phy_dev;
> + int err;
> +
> + phy_dev = fixed_phy_register(PHY_POLL, &fphy_status, -1, NULL);
> + if (!phy_dev || IS_ERR(phy_dev)) {
> + dev_err(bgmac->dev, "Failed to register fixed PHY device\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + err = phy_connect_direct(bgmac->net_dev, phy_dev, bgmac_adjust_link,
> + PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MII);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(bgmac->dev, "Connecting PHY failed\n");
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + return err;
> +}
This bcma specific function looks exactly the same as...
> +static int platform_phy_direct_connect(struct bgmac *bgmac)
> +{
> + struct fixed_phy_status fphy_status = {
> + .link = 1,
> + .speed = SPEED_1000,
> + .duplex = DUPLEX_FULL,
> + };
> + struct phy_device *phy_dev;
> + int err;
> +
> + phy_dev = fixed_phy_register(PHY_POLL, &fphy_status, -1, NULL);
> + if (!phy_dev || IS_ERR(phy_dev)) {
> + dev_err(bgmac->dev, "Failed to register fixed PHY device\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + err = phy_connect_direct(bgmac->net_dev, phy_dev, bgmac_adjust_link,
> + PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MII);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(bgmac->dev, "Connecting PHY failed\n");
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + return err;
> +}
This one.
Would that make sense to keep bgmac_phy_connect_direct and just use it in
bcma/platform code?
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list