[PATCH] ARM: DT: stm32: move dma translation to board files
Bruno Herrera
bruherrera at gmail.com
Wed Nov 2 09:07:53 PDT 2016
Hi
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Alexandre Torgue
<alexandre.torgue at st.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 10/31/2016 07:58 PM, Radosław Pietrzyk wrote:
>>
>> I think wlcore driver searches dma-ranges in its parent that's why sdio
>> node needs it.
>
>
> Yes I agree. In this case it is needed as you have subnode in sdio node.
> So IMO empty dma-ranges could be removed from ethernet and usb node, but
> kept in future sdio subnode.
Now it is clear.
>
> Bruno,
> Do you plan to push sdio support ?
Yes I do, but I'm not sure how long it will take. The I had to
change(and hack) the mmci code because I could not get the ID from
STM32 SDIO IP.
My current WIP is at @
https://github.com/mcoquelin-stm32/afboot-stm32/pull/4#issuecomment-247571615
I know Andrea Merello is also working on that (and he probably has a
more complete patch).
>
>
>
>>
>> 2016-10-31 17:41 GMT+01:00 Bruno Herrera <bruherrera at gmail.com
>> <mailto:bruherrera at gmail.com>>:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Radosław Pietrzyk
>> <radoslaw.pietrzyk at gmail.com <mailto:radoslaw.pietrzyk at gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>> > This is weird because dma ddresses are recalculated using parent's
>> > dma-ranges property and soc already has it so there should be
>> absolutely no
>> > problem.
>>
>> These are my DTS and DTSI file.
>> >
>> > 2016-10-31 11:27 GMT+01:00 Bruno Herrera <bruherrera at gmail.com
>> <mailto:bruherrera at gmail.com>>:
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 5:09 AM, Radosław Pietrzyk
>> >> <radoslaw.pietrzyk at gmail.com
>> <mailto:radoslaw.pietrzyk at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >> > Have you defined your sdio node within soc node ?
>> >>
>> >> It is in the SOC node of the DSTI file.
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > 2016-10-27 14:57 GMT+02:00 Bruno Herrera <bruherrera at gmail.com
>> <mailto:bruherrera at gmail.com>>:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi Alex,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Alexandre Torgue
>> >> >> <alexandre.torgue at st.com <mailto:alexandre.torgue at st.com>>
>> wrote:
>> >> >> > Hi Bruno,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On 10/27/2016 12:43 PM, Bruno Herrera wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Hi Alex,
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Alexandre Torgue
>> >> >> >> <alexandre.torgue at st.com <mailto:alexandre.torgue at st.com>>
>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Hi Bruno,
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> On 10/25/2016 11:06 PM, Bruno Herrera wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> Hi Alexandre,
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> stm32f469-disco and stm32f429-eval boards use SDRAM
>> start address
>> >> >> >>>>> remapping
>> >> >> >>>>> (to @0) to boost performances. A DMA translation through
>> >> >> >>>>> "dma-ranges"
>> >> >> >>>>> property was needed for other masters than the M4 CPU.
>> >> >> >>>>> stm32f429-disco doesn't use remapping so doesn't need
>> this DMA
>> >> >> >>>>> translation.
>> >> >> >>>>> This patches moves this DMA translation definition from
>> stm32f429
>> >> >> >>>>> soc
>> >> >> >>>>> file
>> >> >> >>>>> to board files.
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue at st.com
>> <mailto:alexandre.torgue at st.com>>
>>
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32429i-eval.dts
>> >> >> >>>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32429i-eval.dts
>> >> >> >>>>> index 13c7cd2..a763c15 100644
>> >> >> >>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32429i-eval.dts
>> >> >> >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32429i-eval.dts
>> >> >> >>>>> @@ -82,6 +82,10 @@
>> >> >> >>>>> };
>> >> >> >>>>> };
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> + soc {
>> >> >> >>>>> + dma-ranges = <0xc0000000 0x0 0x10000000>;
>> >> >> >>>>> + };
>> >> >> >>>>> +
>> >> >> >>>>> usbotg_hs_phy: usbphy {
>> >> >> >>>>> #phy-cells = <0>;
>> >> >> >>>>> compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv";
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> Shouldn't also the peripheral dma-ranges property move to
>> board
>> >> >> >>>> specific
>> >> >> >>>> too?
>> >> >> >>>> I had this patch for while but I didn't had the time to
>> submit:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Well spot I forgot it. Actually, discussing with Arnd
>> ysterday on
>> >> >> >>> IIRC,
>> >> >> >>> empty dma-ranges is not needed. Can you test on your side by
>> >> >> >>> removing
>> >> >> >>> dma-ranges in usb node please ?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Unfortunately will take a time for me to set up this
>> environment on
>> >> >> >> the STM32F4-EVAL board.
>> >> >> >> And on the discovery boards we dont have this scenario.
>> That was the
>> >> >> >> main reason I did not submit the patch right away.
>> >> >> >> My conclusion and I might be wrong but is based on the my
>> tests with
>> >> >> >> SDIO device at STM32F469I-DISCO board.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I started this issue as discussion at ST Forum but Maxime
>> gave me
>> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> hint.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>>
>> https://my.st.com/public/STe2ecommunities/mcu/Lists/cortex_mx_stm32/Flat.aspx?RootFolder=https%3a%2f%2fmy%2est%2ecom%2fpublic%2fSTe2ecommunities%2fmcu%2fLists%2fcortex_mx_stm32%2fDMA2%20and%20SYSCFG_MEMRMP%20relationship&FolderCTID=0x01200200770978C69A1141439FE559EB459D7580009C4E14902C3CDE46A77F0FFD06506F5B¤tviews=44
>>
>> <https://my.st.com/public/STe2ecommunities/mcu/Lists/cortex_mx_stm32/Flat.aspx?RootFolder=https%3a%2f%2fmy%2est%2ecom%2fpublic%2fSTe2ecommunities%2fmcu%2fLists%2fcortex_mx_stm32%2fDMA2%20and%20SYSCFG_MEMRMP%20relationship&FolderCTID=0x01200200770978C69A1141439FE559EB459D7580009C4E14902C3CDE46A77F0FFD06506F5B¤tviews=44>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> I will push a v2 by removing empty dma-ranges if tests are
>> ok in
>> >> >> >>> your
>> >> >> >>> side.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> From my understating/conclusion is: when empty
>> property(dma-ranges)
>> >> >> >> is
>> >> >> >> the device node, the mapping will be taken in consideration
>> when
>> >> >> >> using
>> >> >> >> DMA otherwise the mapping is ignored.
>> >> >> >> And in the SDIO case it is needed for DEV->MEM(SDRAM) and
>> >> >> >> MEM(SDRAM)->DEV. If it is not the case for the devices in
>> question
>> >> >> >> so
>> >> >> >> I suppose it can work without the property.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > For sure translation has to be done but I'm not sure that an
>> empty
>> >> >> > "dma-ranges" is needed in device node to activate it. For
>> Ethernet
>> >> >> > empty
>> >> >> > "dma-ranges" is not needed. I will try with usb.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> In the case of SDIO it is needed. As example this is my
>> working SDIO
>> >> >> node:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> sdio: sdio at 40012c00 {
>> >> >> compatible = "arm,pl18x", "arm,primecell";
>> >> >> arm,primecell-periphid = <0x00480181>;
>> >> >> reg = <0x40012c00 0x400>;
>> >> >> dmas = <&dma2 6 4 0x10400 0x3>, /* Logical - DevToMem */
>> >> >> <&dma2 3 4 0x10400 0x3>; /* Logical - MemToDev */
>> >> >> dma-names = "rx", "tx";
>> >> >> clocks = <&rcc 0 171>;
>> >> >> clock-names = "apb_pclk";
>> >> >> interrupts = <49>;
>> >> >> status = "disabled";
>> >> >> };
>> >> >>
>> >> >> &sdio {
>> >> >> status = "okay";
>> >> >> vmmc-supply = <&wlan_en>;
>> >> >> bus-width = <4>;
>> >> >> max-frequency = <24000000>;
>> >> >> pinctrl-names = "default";
>> >> >> pinctrl-0 = <&sdio_pins>;
>> >> >> ti,non-removable;
>> >> >> ti,needs-special-hs-handling;
>> >> >> dma-ranges;
>> >> >> cap-power-off-card;
>> >> >> keep-power-in-suspend;
>> >> >>
>> >> >> #address-cells = <1>;
>> >> >> #size-cells = <0>;
>> >> >> wlcore: wlcore at 0 {
>> >> >> compatible = "ti,wl1835";
>> >> >> reg = <2>;
>> >> >> interrupt-parent = <&gpioa>;
>> >> >> interrupts = <8 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>> >> >> };
>> >> >> };
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > alex
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Thanks in advance
>> >> >> >>> Alex
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> Author: Bruno Herrera <bruherrera at gmail.com
>> <mailto:bruherrera at gmail.com>>
>>
>> >> >> >>>> Date: Sun Oct 16 14:50:00 2016 -0200
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> ARM: DT: STM32: Use dma-ranges property per board not
>> at dtsi
>> >> >> >>>> file
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32429i-eval.dts
>> >> >> >>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32429i-eval.dts
>> >> >> >>>> index 6bfc595..2a22a82 100644
>> >> >> >>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32429i-eval.dts
>> >> >> >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32429i-eval.dts
>> >> >> >>>> @@ -52,6 +52,10 @@
>> >> >> >>>> model = "STMicroelectronics STM32429i-EVAL board";
>> >> >> >>>> compatible = "st,stm32429i-eval", "st,stm32f429";
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> + soc {
>> >> >> >>>> + dma-ranges = <0xC0000000 0x0 0x10000000>;
>> >> >> >>>> + };
>> >> >> >>>> +
>> >> >> >>>> chosen {
>> >> >> >>>> bootargs = "root=/dev/ram rdinit=/linuxrc";
>> >> >> >>>> stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
>> >> >> >>>> @@ -96,6 +100,7 @@
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> ðernet0 {
>> >> >> >>>> status = "okay";
>> >> >> >>>> + dma-ranges;
>> >> >> >>>> pinctrl-0 = <ðernet0_mii>;
>> >> >> >>>> pinctrl-names = "default";
>> >> >> >>>> phy-mode = "mii-id";
>> >> >> >>>> @@ -116,6 +121,7 @@
>> >> >> >>>> };
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> &usbotg_hs {
>> >> >> >>>> + dma-ranges;
>> >> >> >>>> dr_mode = "host";
>> >> >> >>>> phys = <&usbotg_hs_phy>;
>> >> >> >>>> phy-names = "usb2-phy";
>> >> >> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
>> >> >> >>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
>> >> >> >>>> index 7d624a2..697a133 100644
>> >> >> >>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
>> >> >> >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
>> >> >> >>>> @@ -59,7 +59,6 @@
>> >> >> >>>> };
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> soc {
>> >> >> >>>> - dma-ranges = <0xc0000000 0x0 0x10000000>;
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> timer2: timer at 40000000 {
>> >> >> >>>> compatible = "st,stm32-timer";
>> >> >> >>>> @@ -472,13 +471,11 @@
>> >> >> >>>> st,syscon = <&syscfg 0x4>;
>> >> >> >>>> snps,pbl = <8>;
>> >> >> >>>> snps,mixed-burst;
>> >> >> >>>> - dma-ranges;
>> >> >> >>>> status = "disabled";
>> >> >> >>>> };
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> usbotg_hs: usb at 40040000 {
>> >> >> >>>> compatible = "snps,dwc2";
>> >> >> >>>> - dma-ranges;
>> >> >> >>>> reg = <0x40040000 0x40000>;
>> >> >> >>>> interrupts = <77>;
>> >> >> >>>> clocks = <&rcc 0 29>;
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
>> >> >> >>>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
>> >> >> >>>>> index 0596d60..3a1cfdd 100644
>> >> >> >>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
>> >> >> >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
>> >> >> >>>>> @@ -59,8 +59,6 @@
>> >> >> >>>>> };
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> soc {
>> >> >> >>>>> - dma-ranges = <0xc0000000 0x0 0x10000000>;
>> >> >> >>>>> -
>> >> >> >>>>> timer2: timer at 40000000 {
>> >> >> >>>>> compatible = "st,stm32-timer";
>> >> >> >>>>> reg = <0x40000000 0x400>;
>> >> >> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts
>> >> >> >>>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts
>> >> >> >>>>> index 9e73656..c2213c0 100644
>> >> >> >>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts
>> >> >> >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts
>> >> >> >>>>> @@ -64,6 +64,10 @@
>> >> >> >>>>> aliases {
>> >> >> >>>>> serial0 = &usart3;
>> >> >> >>>>> };
>> >> >> >>>>> +
>> >> >> >>>>> + soc {
>> >> >> >>>>> + dma-ranges = <0xc0000000 0x0 0x10000000>;
>> >> >> >>>>> + };
>> >> >> >>>>> };
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> &clk_hse {
>> >> >> >>>>> --
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> Br.,
>> >> >> >>>> Bruno
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> >> >> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> <mailto:linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org>
>> >> >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>> <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list