[PATCH 1/2] mmc: sdhci-iproc: Add brcm, sdhci-iproc compat string in bindings document

[Scott Branden]

Hi Rob,

On 16-10-18 01:08 PM, Scott Branden wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 16-10-18 06:16 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:35:51AM -0700, Scott Branden wrote:
>>> Adds brcm,sdhci-iproc compat string to DT bindings document for
>>> the iProc SDHCI driver.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel at broadcom.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden at broadcom.com>
>>> ---
>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/brcm,sdhci-iproc.txt | 1 +
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git
>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/brcm,sdhci-iproc.txt
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/brcm,sdhci-iproc.txt
>>> index be56d2b..aa58b94 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/brcm,sdhci-iproc.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/brcm,sdhci-iproc.txt
>>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ Required properties:
>>>  - compatible : Should be one of the following
>>>             "brcm,bcm2835-sdhci"
>>>             "brcm,sdhci-iproc-cygnus"
>>> +           "brcm,sdhci-iproc"
>>
>> Seems kind of generic. SoC specific compatible strings please.
>>
> The compatibility string is generic on purpose as it is not intended to
> be SoC specific but work on all new iproc SoCs that have the proper
> fixes in place for this block (unlike bcm2835 and cygnus class devices
> which can only do 32-bit accesses).  I could call it brcm,sdhci-iproc-v2
> if that is better or leave it as is.  Please let me know your preferences.
>
I just sent out v2 of the patch with additional details in the device 
tree bindings document.  Please let me know if this covers your 
concerns.  The SDHCI controller binding is not SoC specific and is used 
in multiple SoCs going forward with the same binding.

> Regards,
> Scott