[PATCH 2/3] mmc: sunxi: Fix DDR MMC timings for A80

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens at csie.org> wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 29-05-16 09:04, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>>
>>> The MMC clock timings were incorrectly calculated, when the conversion
>>> from delay value to delay phase was done.
>>>
>>> The 50M DDR and 50M DDR 8bit timings are off, and make eMMC DDR
>>> unusable. Unfortunately it seems different controllers on the same SoC
>>> have different timings. The new settings are taken from mmc2, which is
>>> commonly used with eMMC.
>>
>>
>> Hmm, I'm not really all that familiar with mmc, but can't an external
>> sdcard connected to mmc0 use DDR too ? Assuming the answer is yes, then
>> we really need to update the driver to use the right per controller
>> timings.
>
> I would very much like that to happen. However, SD card UHS-1 DDR modes
> require 1.8V signaling, which is unavailable on _all_ sunxi boards.
> This seems like a limit of most of the SoCs not having a separate IO
> voltage rail for mmc pins.
>
> Until then, I wouldn't worry that much.

P.S. I also tried the settings from mmc0 in Allwinner sources. They gave
horrible results ( < 5 MB/s read ) on my CC-A80, while my Optimus wasn't
really affected. I wonder if there's some kind of auto-retry mechanism
in the MMC controller, or driver?

ChenYu

>>> The settings for the slower timing modes seem to work despite being
>>> wrong, so leave them be.
>>
>>
>> If you're sure the timings are wrong, please fix them. Sometimes wrong
>> timings do seem to work, but lead to unreliable communication, or turn
>> out to work on some boards and not on others due to routing differences.
>
> Unfortunately I did try putting in the correct numbers for them, and my
> eMMC then failed to probe. It seems the core switches up from 400kHz to
> 50MHz then to 50MHz DDR, and it fails somewhere in there, maybe at 50MHz.
>
> I'm not sure if we need to add DT bindings to specify different delays
> for different controllers, though. Seems like we'll never actually use
> it.
>
> Hope this answers your questions.
>
> Regards
> ChenYu
>
>> Thanks & Regards,
>>
>> Hans
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens at csie.org>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c | 4 ++--
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
>>> index 7fc8b7aa83f0..5873dc344ab2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
>>> @@ -970,8 +970,8 @@ static const struct sunxi_mmc_clk_delay
>>> sun9i_mmc_clk_delays[] = {
>>>         [SDXC_CLK_400K]         = { .output = 180, .sample = 180 },
>>>         [SDXC_CLK_25M]          = { .output = 180, .sample =  75 },
>>>         [SDXC_CLK_50M]          = { .output = 150, .sample = 120 },
>>> -       [SDXC_CLK_50M_DDR]      = { .output =  90, .sample = 120 },
>>> -       [SDXC_CLK_50M_DDR_8BIT] = { .output =  90, .sample = 120 },
>>> +       [SDXC_CLK_50M_DDR]      = { .output =  54, .sample =  36 },
>>> +       [SDXC_CLK_50M_DDR_8BIT] = { .output =  72, .sample =  72 },
>>>  };
>>>
>>>  static int sunxi_mmc_resource_request(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host,
>>>
>>