4.5.0 on sun7i-a20-olinuxino-lime2: libphy: PHY stmmac-0:ffffffff not found (regression from rc7)
Andre Heider
a.heider at gmail.com
Fri May 20 03:30:30 PDT 2016
Hi,
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO
<peppe.cavallaro at st.com> wrote:
> On 5/20/2016 9:56 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>
>> On 20/05/16 06:44, Andre Heider wrote:
>>>
>>> Giuseppe, Alexandre, et al.,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:56:40 +0100
>>>> Bert Lindner <bert at a20.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2016-03-16 18:42, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 16/03/16 15:10, Bert Lindner wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2016-03-16 14:10, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 16.03.2016 um 13:09 schrieb Robin Murphy:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 16/03/16 11:39, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 16/03/16 11:19, Bert Lindner wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> For the board sun7i-a20-olinuxino-lime2, there seems to be a
>>>>>>>>>>> problem
>>>>>>>>>>> with the eth0 PHY in mainline kernel 4.5.0 that developed since
>>>>>>>>>>> 4.5.0-rc7. Ethernet does not work, although eth0 is reported:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 9.767125] NET: Registered protocol family 10
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 10.357405] libphy: PHY stmmac-0:ffffffff not found
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 10.362382] eth0: Could not attach to PHY
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 10.366557] stmmac_open: Cannot attach to PHY (error: -19)
>>>
>>> ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> v4 fixes for 4.5 are here:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/598195/ (revert)
>>>>>>>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/598196/
>>>
>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good to know, thanks. Could you also give the potential fix a go (as
>>>>>> mentioned by Andreas)? Just to make sure that whatever gets merged
>>>>>> next
>>>>>> will actually fix the issue.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes sure, it took a while because I had to travel. Confirmed, the
>>>>> v4-for-4.5 fix works well for me, on sun7i-a20-olinuxino-lime2:
>>>>>
>>>>> root at lime2-079f:~# cat /proc/version
>>>>> Linux version 4.5.0-598195-598196-v4 (root at lime2-079f) (gcc version
>>>>> 4.9.1 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.9.1-16ubuntu6) ) #1 SMP Wed Mar 16 16:44:22 UTC
>>>>> 2016
>>>>>
>>>>> dmesg:
>>>>> [ 8.245273] NET: Registered protocol family 10
>>>>> [ 9.297406] RX IPC Checksum Offload disabled
>>>>> [ 9.297460] No MAC Management Counters available
>>>>> [ 9.297951] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
>>>>> [ 16.285658] sun7i-dwmac 1c50000.ethernet eth0: Link is Up -
>>>>> 1Gbps/Full - flow control rx/tx
>>>>> [ 16.285798] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready
>>>>>
>>>>> The board is connected to my laptop rather than to a switch, so that
>>>>> might be where the flow control message comes from (not sure). Anyway
>>>>> ethernet works.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cool, many thanks for taking the time to test and report.
>>>>
>>>> Hopefully Giuseppe will get this merged quickly enough in mainline, and
>>>> it should then trickle into a 4.5-stable release (cc-ing stable on
>>>> these patches would probably be a good idea, BTW).
>>>
>>>
>>> stmmac is broken on at least Lime2, BananaPi and Cubieboard2 since
>>> v4.5 [0], including all five stable releases :(
>>
>>
>> All the A20 platforms are dead, actually.
>>
>>> The v4.5 patches quoted above are already +4 weeks old, could we
>>> please get them into stable?
>>
>>
>> For that, the maintainer would have needed to CC stable, which he
>> didn't. I'd expect someone who cares to send these patches to stable.
>> It'd be better if the maintainer would do it himself though.
>
>
> sure, I can send the patches to stable (sorry if I missed to add
> stable ML on CC).
>
> Andre, I have not clear if the train of patches actually fix the
> issue or if you need my support to fix something else. In that case
> I need some input for debugging (e.g. kernel log).
Bert already confirmed that those two patches fixes stmmac on his
Lime2, so I assume that it fixes the issue for all A20 platforms.
> let me know, is it enough to re-send the patches only?
Just a resend with cc:stable :)
Thanks!
Andre
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list