Unclear BSD licensing (headers, MODULE_LICENSE, versions)

Andrew Lunn andrew at lunn.ch
Sun May 15 08:39:29 PDT 2016

On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 12:44:35AM +0200, Rafa?? Mi??ecki wrote:
> Hi,
> I recently received a hint that it would be nice/expected to have DTS
> files licensed under BSD.

I've not done a count, but i think you will find that most device tree
files use X11 as the second license, not BSD.


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list