QRTR merge conflict resolution (was: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree)

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Friday 13 May 2016 17:47:17 Andy Gross wrote:
> On 13 May 2016 at 17:19, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson at linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Fri 13 May 14:01 PDT 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> >> On Tuesday 10 May 2016 11:39:34 Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > [..]
> >> > I assume we could have the QRTR go through Andy and arm-soc, with
> >> > David's approval and this fix squashed in. But we're running rather late
> >> > in this cycle, perhaps we should just back the QRTR patches out and I
> >> > can respin and resend them after the merge window (for v4.8 instead)?
> >>
> >> I'd suggest you do a merge of next-next with the qcom/soc-2 branch that
> >> we have in arm-soc and resolve the conflict in the merge, then send
> >> a pull request with the merge to davem.
> >>
> >
> > Hi David,
> >
> > In case you missed this thread, linux-next highlighted an upcoming merge
> > conflict between the net-next and one of the branches included in the
> > arm-soc trees.
> >
> > I have prepared the merge of net-next and the conflicting tag from the
> > Qualcomm SOC, please include this in your pull towards Linus to avoid
> > the merge conflict.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bjorn
> >
> > The following changes since commit ed7cbbce544856b20e5811de373cf92e92499771:
> >
> >   udp: Resolve NULL pointer dereference over flow-based vxlan device (2016-05-13 01:56:14 -0400)
> 
> 
> OK. The contents look good to me.
> 
> Acked-by: Andy Gross <andy.gross at linaro.org>

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>