[PATCH V7 07/11] pci, acpi: Handle ACPI companion assignment.
Rafael J. Wysocki
rafael at kernel.org
Thu May 12 04:27:23 PDT 2016
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Jayachandran C <jchandra at broadcom.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas at kernel.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:30:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
>>> <lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com> wrote:
>>> > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 08:37:00PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> >> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Tomasz Nowicki <tn at semihalf.com> wrote:
> If we are moving the ACPI/PCI code from drivers/acpi to
> arch/arm64/ , there is an issue in having the header file
> ecam.h in drivers/pci
> The current include of "../pci/ecam.h" is slightly ugly (Arnd
> and David had already noted this), but including the driver
> header from arch code would be even worse.
> I can either merge ecam.h into include/linux/pci.h
> or move it to a new file include/linux/pci-ecam.h, any
> suggestion on which is preferable?
My preference would be pci-ecam.h as we did a similar thing for
pci-dma.h, for example, but basically this is up to Bjorn.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel